Matchups were alot better this week ;-), lag has always played a part in wars but saturdays war was beyond a joke,the lag issue needs to be fixed if anything for me it has got worse ,even though im self koing alot of the time lag is making wars less enjoyable,maybe u should cap clan numbers to 35 cus any more than that seems to be a lag fest ;-)
Are you guys messing with the plunder? At level two eatoc edge a few days ago i was getting 37 mil an attack from full troops. Then it went back to 34. Now at level 3 i was making 36 mil a hit from full troops, and now its dropped again and im barely making 33 mil a hit. Whats going on?
Devs re future concern for mith payout in 2 hour wars, currently a clan ff and the players are lucky to make a single mith profit from 2 hour war or a modest amount at best. How will you adress this to ensure 2 hour wars are usable and worth doing to gain an actual mith bonus worth having?? And will you consider scrapping the clan loyalty failed Estocs lock in incentive? It hasn't worked. Clans are using loyal members in wars but with war clans we could help assist in creating better matches with fuller clans closing gaps with alliances warring from 1 clan. Also it eliminates veil and inactives going to war clan. At least until the home clan and war clan plan can be implemented. Matchups do appear to be getting better overall (saturday felt for our opponents ) friday. Figures were spot on. though yes you are limited by who signs up. Hence bigger fuller allaince war clans may help. Also with the lag at the start especially could you stagger starts when match ups made say in blocks of 5/10/15 minutes for x % amount of clans. Or maybe offer us two wars each day and allow a clan to select only one war so they can choose best time for clan and also this may help reduce lag if the numbers warring are divided throughout the day.
I think the regen was the most superb. It was actually variable between 15m10s n 15m50s. Very cool, if I must say so..., New equipment. Groan. Just buying no frills
devs , forfiting should be disabled. it is not fair to the winning clan that has workes hard to win, also u said mith payment would increase this weekend , i dident notice an increase, and third YOU said that the new edge would give the % to ur ally plunder aswell , on a haunt my ally plunder with no edge is 25bil , a 25% increase would mean i should get 31.25 bill ally plunder , so why dont i ?
Lag is worse not better! Was Ko'd when bar still said I had 15k troops. C'mon man!! Fix the lag please!!!
A simple fix to the bad matchups would be to cap the clan limit to 40, if you have more in clan wanting to war, use another clan. The old system wars numbers didn't give you a huge advantage, these new wars however, numbers can decimate the opposing clan, keeping every single member in KO while you sit at half bar. The way it is now there will be no end to everyone crying about unfair matchups, when really what can the Devs do? They have to work with the clans that signup, there's always going to be one clan with 50 and another with 80 that need to be matched up together.
Ok so this weekend we've had two forfeits and the mith payout is low when taking cost of new equips into account. How are we meant to save up to fully enchant the equips at this rate (about 40 mith per war) especially when our opponents are forfeiting half way through, reducing our potential mith earnings. The devs stated that mith payments will vary from week to week as the opponents pot/mith usage can be high or low which directly effects the winners payment. This is irrelevant as the mith payments are still to low to give us a fair chance of getting equips and enchanting then. I did 3 wars this week and won all them and prob got about 120 mith from all 3 after subtracting mith used for spells. That isn't even enough for the grieves and a lot of people don't do 3 wars a week. Mith payments need tinkering!
I LOVE the way my items RESET TO ZERO regularly , it's that single reason I stopped purchasing crystals etc for the past few months ... Thankyou for saving me real money devs , I can enjoy more real life perks and realise what a stupid way to spend real ££ this game actually is . Shame for you I suppose that your net profits will be dropping as I'm sure others do the same... But thanks all the same Stop the resets ... Just a bit of sound financial advice ...
Is ally plunder supposed to increase by % of estoc level spell or not? It did for awhile Friday then went back to a lower lvl. What's up? Why does it take so long to answer? I see a hundred people asked and no response?
@panic if you lock at 40 it will break up clans which they won't do and nor should they. Also you'd end up with 40 biggest in clan warring and no smalls would get a chance to war. Sorry mate bad idea. Better to remove estocs locking us in clan. The loyalty incentive has failed devs admit that. Let us use war clans. War with alliance friends in full clans. Where match ups can be more even in numbers if nothing else. It also solves any need for a flawed veil spell that no one likes. Also remember as clans reputations rise they will grow in numbers and strength. Not all clans go into wars even there are always poor matches. It's how we deal with them. FF needs to go so hard warring clans don't get robbed of rewards of mith. And also how will 2 hour system work if mith payout so low over a two hour limit Kaw_Admin. We will still use the same to enter war yet see little or no profit in mith with current system based on the results of those who have had to deal with ff wins.
Glad you said that Dark , shame they seem to ignore feedback and emails regarding this fact , they dont address it whatsoever. Far too frustrating. Fails I don't mind, fair enough, you burn your inferno / aqua/ mithril up.. But the resets... Far far far too harsh . They really do need to stop. Take note devs , it's a very common thought amongst your players , this game is a hobby to me, and I don't mind spending money on a hobby ... But if I feel moved/frustrated enough to stop all expenditure on this hobby , then maybe you should listen...
Match ups for war seem verey unfair i am 33 strongest in clan there 33 strongest had almost 2 mill cs more than me 3 wars in a row with match ups like that so the devs just want the top clans too win and get mith. I will not spend any more real money on crystals. I thought ee wars would make the game more fun just made the game more un fair good job devs. You saved me money. Only top plays do war i guess the rest do ebs. Epic fail
I will agree with everyting. I did 3 wars last 2 weeks. I think I will be able to do mostly 1 war per week. Considering I got 115 mith from 3 wars that gives roughly 40/war, i will need 1,5 month for greaves... And that is only one piece. That is irrelevant. And considering ff option, 15-30 mith (excluding mith from spells) per war is... a joke. There was an update that mith payout will be raised 25-50%. I didn't notice ANY difference. Last thing - mith pay depends on how many pots we are using or burning from enemies. I scouted a lot today, making much much more succesfull actions than i did previously, and got LESS than i was assasinating. So how does it work? Would it be easier if your payment depends on just number of succesfull action and/or plunder and/or number of ko's?
@ kaw_admin I was awarded both estoc edge level 2 and 4 after war now I can't hit epic battle due to mith error
If it's Mithril , and the currency is no longer for sale, we need a fixed rate on Enchantments. Otherwise a Clan should attack and assassinate the Mage to Death when he fails or resets Equipment.