KAW admin why would you want to make tighter rosters? the people that want to war match them selves up to the clans they want to war, they watch them for hours and track what there numbers and bfa are at. if u limit to a 4 person spread theres no strategy and you are making it so that less dedicated clans can have easy matches. those who want to war will continue to get matches based on strategy and planning. seems to me your decision isent to better match up over all but to make match up easyer for lazy clans. :!:
1st off think ppl need to calm down about the bfa thing. I highly doubt devs will do anything. Think of the statement like it was the achievement's. They just said it to shut up the ppl crying and most likely have no intentions of actually carrying out any investigations. So props devs for at least attempting to retain a few EE warriors. 2ndly to the developers. I strongly believe you need to figure out ways to increase the amount of clans warring rather than put the ones that currently war in a headlock by changing signup numbers yet again. Of course it would be easier to match exactly 35 vs 35. But then what is the point of having 100 member clans if you have to potentially tell 65 of them to kick rocks. Hmmmm seems your tactic of "creating family bonds between clans" has become "u can't fight with your family in these wars. Go find another family. One that doesn't already have 35 family members". That my friends is called an epic backfire. So now that we realize the plan has backfired, why not remove the restriction of losing EE when u leave clan?? That would increase the amount of clans warring for sure. That would be a good start. Also why still the refusal to acknowledge that crystals are a vital part of these wars, and everyone can't afford them with real life money. If you made a "gold purchasable crystal" usable only in EE wars you would see another jump in participation. The way it seems now is you are trying to put a stranglehold on your players by making them HAVE ROAM TO FIND EE. Putting further member limit restrictions only proves more that this wasn't about creating clan unity, but more of a "here look we did something new now shut up for a while". And more restrictions means more hassle which inevitably leads to less participation. Also I believe that the new pots that were added being such an expense keeps a lot of players from warring. It cost 1b in pots to unload attacks. And 50% more to unload spies using pots. That's not adding the 15b already spent on mithral. Release your foot from our throats pls. Quit acting like the American government and keeping the rich rich while ing on your little guys. In b4 the "war should be expensive" comments. Osw should be expensive. This isn't a type of war that we should all be losing so much to participate in. Especially to have the no match keep ppl from achieving anything substantial in the long run Tl;dr version. Think of ways to increase participation not enact more restrictions that will decrease it
Very amusing how dumb people are acting in regards to the BFA changes after matchup. If you really don't know what Kaw Admin is referring to then you have nothing to worry about and continue as you normally play. Those that are doing this know exactly what KaW Admin is referring to and why it is done.
@pdqb You're joking right? You've not seen a 1T ally getting hired off 2-min before war start. And what do you want me to do? Save it in BB for a 25% loss. You dear sir are a moron. Please think before saying unthought out things here.
MIck makes a great point here, so often between clans I see people not wanting to go war at a subclan because they lose a level of EE. If this didn't happen, people would be willing to branch out from the large warring clans and war in smaller groups. Since the limits are low, having a full clan of people never leave is just not suitable. Better to split into 2 and give everyone maximum warring potential.
Victim here. Hansel an have spy allies for BFA. After match up my allies were bought from sub of clan we were warring. I couldn't buy back because I was banked for war. Lost a lot of spy BFA. Support on disabling hire... But what if sub clan of team you are against buys yours during match up? Has anyone thought of that factor??
@KaW_admin's reply to Val Not the thread for new ideas.... Let's throw out old ideas that didn't work the first time and hammer away at em til we get ppl to agree to it. Seems legit How about instead of continuously throwing out these same ol washed up ideas of clan restrictions, which seemingly continue to fail even when enacted, why not brainstorm and come up with ideas to increase the participation? I know y'all upped the mithral payout, changed the member limits, and a few other tweaks were made, but still participation isn't what it should be. Wouldn't it be easier to find matches for 100 clans than it would be to match 50 clans? I see what's going on tho. U don't want to increase participation because it would completely overload your already slow EE server. And of course you guys don't want to have to shell out a cent to upgrade that. What other reason could there be???? Do you just not want everyone to war???
Guys kaw_admin isn't gonna answer to new ideas cuz it throws the thread off subject so please stop spending the time to write paragraphs on new ideas -thick_and_juicy
@darkness. Exactly. U should see cc here. We have an entire clan full of ppl that want to war but have to tell the majority "oh na u can't war here already have the limit". But we can't send em to a subclan to war either or they have to stay at the subclan to keep their rewarded Edge. So we have an entire 35 man squad here that WOULD BE warring were it not for the restrictions KaW has in place to keep them from warring. And I know. They could go war and come back and just lose EE. If that's the argument someone will put up then I rebutt it beforehand with "why even have edge then?""
Hire button? I suggest War prevent hiring by outsiders as well. Such as when someone wants to hire our allies during war, a pop up says, "pqdb is currently unavailable for hiring as owner is in war." Then no one needs to frantically search for ally to hire and we don't have to spend Nobs or Sell BB/Pots to hire back the ally.
Next guys w/o brain. If buying allies will be locked before matchup, then HOW someone can be buy ur allies 2min before war start? BEFORE METCHUP - means ur future enemy dont know who will be his opponent so he will not strip all KaW players lol. When he will see his opponent he will not strip you coz it will be blocked. Only one risk is when you have osw with other clan. They can strip their enemy before roster lock but all good clans dont participate in estock during osw so...
This match up is the worst yet we are outnumbered by 5 players and they are stronger. Why? How is that fair at all
Dear Kaw_Admin I believe I have a solution to no matches, that makes everyone happy. Hear me out. I believe every clan that gets a no match should get 1 Level Of Rancor. I believe this is extremely fair, because clans that win get 2, and clans that lose get 0. 1 is right in the middle. Please Reply your thoughts. Thanks, Eagle
Because unbanking to the nearest million gold to rebuy is going to hurt your overall warring ability. Just be quiet.
we get stupid war2 matchup - enemy_RCA_ rank stronger then Willders Chili and additional 3 members moreunfair!!!