That is correct, the numbers shown initially (38) was not correct. By our count, it is at 36 right now.
It will show 38 players on the MW war roster, but it will show you a message saying that you cannot deliver hits to someone outside of the war. Just a heads up, don't waste your time trying to hit them. :lol:
So this is what happen so you guys can understand why I am pissed. We originally had 28 for war #7. After the supposedly roster lock we had 3 cast for war #8. They were actually casted for #7 even though they casted after sign up. We feedback the devs saying these guys were not supposed to be active please adjust out matchup. We got a response back that says they are taken out and were not included in match up. So we lost 3 members and are out numbered 31vs 28. Ok no biggie thank you devs for fixing your mistake. Then we start war and whose in war #7 the 3 that you told were taken out. You even pm them and told them they were not active for war #7. Now we have 3 inactives. Still think you guys don't suck?
Prince, those extra members were not counted in the calculation. It's still a match up you guys would've gotten. Moose, did you bother reading anything here? :lol:
ATA have become so unreliable. *European' wartimes are been meesed up twice this week, just as the don't want us in their WC, only US, UK & Canadians allowed. The rest of the riff raff can stay at the other 'wc'. Regarding tonights war it does say 38 vs 33, if there is 2 Murder barcodes that is not really in war, making it 36 vs 33, do Kaw admin reckon this is an disafvantage just the same ? wasting troops finding them, while being ko'd ? Stronger clans really shouldn't have more warriors as well imo.
DaMoOose is asking for the breakdown that kaw@admin has posted for others who have questioned their match ups. It's a legitimate question given the history of changes, errors and general haphazard way EE wars look from some perspectives. Let us support each other, communicate effectively and offer valuable feedback to improve the system, yes?
Anyone complaining ever try to satisfy a world wide base of players on a game they created? No? Hmmm that's weird. You all seem to be such great game developers, and amazing business men ( and women) please PM me the name of the game YOU created so I can see how it's done properly. Take a second out to remember your playing an IPhone game. This is not World of Warcraft it's not Crisis is Kaw. Last year Kaw devs didn't even care, they have come a long way from a chat company. Rome wasn't built in a day. And Kaw used to be 25 lands no clans. Think about it.
Stella, everything that moose needs for a breakdown is in this thread. More of a breakdown than devs ever gave us. They gave exact numbers, and the 38 is really 36. There will be 2 players that are at the bottom of the list. They have 0 actions, 0 plunder. You don't have to waste time finding them. Just scroll down to see who not to hit.
No Match Data Signups - 45 No Match - 8 ZAFT Corporation - Your BFA was over 3X the next closest clan. Your build stats were over 50% larger than the next closest clan. _RCA_ - You signed up with the lower end of the signups at 25 members, but this is most likely an odd man out situation. UnBeKnowN - There were no many clans that had the same build stats as you, with the large BFA that you have. Devs, 20% no match ups again. Some very good clans that cannot war here. 2 ideas for this. 1. Make an unlimited war class. The normal class will get computer matched as it is now with your current strenght calculations. The unlimited war class is for clans like Zaft, -00-, RCA, and others the chance to field a team with a set number of kingdoms to take on any challanger to put up a team against them. For Example, Zaft would put up 35 Kingdoms to war against anyone who would challenge them with 40 kingdoms or less. Put up the stats, clan name, members, build strength, and BFA. The first clan to take them on gets to do that war. This war would start 30 minutes after the normal war start times to give clans the ability to make these decisions. At 2 hours with roster locked, you have a 10 minute matchup period to decide. If you do not chose an unlimited match, you and go in the normal pool for war matchups. This also has some potential abuses but you may be able to find a way around it. Or 2. this could be like the no match clans other alternative to war since they did not fit Devs calculations. Give these clans a chance to choose to war any of the clans that did not get a match. You put out the stats like you do here. Your clan name: XYZ Members: 36 Build Stats: 18.3 BFA: 10.1 Clan A (not real clan name) members: 32 Build Stats: 22.1 BFA: 11.8 Clan B (not real clan name) members: 28 Build Stats: 26.3 BFA: 4.1 etc. Clans put out offers to war, other clan accepts. Once match is accepted, then they find out the name. Or they chose not to war. Offers and acceptance is on a first come first serve basis. Wait too long to make a decision and there will be no one left to war with. This gives the other clans the option to war and specialized EE clans like the worms, can choose to take on larger clans so they can make a name for themselves instead of complaining about no matches all the time. Option 2 is mostly annonymous so clans can not pick their own clan to war against. This option 2 also gives the final decision to war or not to war to the clans themselves. (Not the devs) I think Option 2 is the best for the no match scenario, but option 1 of having an unlimited category war taking on any challenger would add some spice and variety to the war scene. Something to think about. Cheers.
To the small worm guy...how are we supposed to know who is inactive at the start of the war on the first unloads..I'm hitting no 36 in clan roster who has woc cast and full mith..b4 I realise I lost my whole attack bar with inc hits..didn't see anything here in forum stating that.
Should've checked if he had mith spells casted. :lol: You're SOL then. And if you're trying to offend me by saying I'm small, try harder. I am purposely small.
Devs we have a serious issue!!!! Flawless victory has active players in war roster and not in war on clan roster. Thus meaning the matchup is bad and everyone needs to be credited a win on both sides of the war. (mithril) This match up should of never of happen look at the difference in stats.... Please explain the breakdown!!! since you say the extra numbers in war didn't matter along with the breakdown I would like to see the bfa before matchup and the bfa during the war!!!! I will not be supporting this game with the funding I am until these issues are corrected!!!! Waiting for a serious response...
Are you referring to yourself? If it says you cannot hit someone outside the war, then move onto another target.
@Moose from 7sins Strength ranking is also based on members; for example, we one time were given the rank 1 in terms of strength, because we maxed out at 40 members, ahead of -RCA- even though their kingdoms are obviously bigger, just because they had less signups. So strength and numbers are directly related, there are not two distinct advantages.
DEVS .......How is it Im in the war #7 but I am not able to hit the Regulators and they re not able to hit me...I applied all mith to be in the war plus. I wasted the last of my mith on a war it shows Im in but can not hit. One of the Regulaters did test if he could hit me and he could hit me from outside on the war. I would like to have all of my mith replaced plus why this happend. I would also like to have my clan reemburced for any mith they loose if they loose the EE due to me not being the the EE. I have been playing this game almost 3 years and have spent alot of money on this game I think this issue needs to be fixed ASAP. I do not know if any other players have had the same problem, but I am sure they would like the same to happen for their clan as well. these are the news post I recived from you. You are not in War 7. There was a bug where you were temporarily set active but we have fixed this. and This did not affect the matchup as you were not included in the stat calculations, only the member count. But I was still was not allowed to join the war, but it shows Im in the war. Thank you -_-everdancewiththedevil-_-
@Prince I agree this is crap. I've enjoyed our close wars against GHC and find them quite competitive. This just isn't right for y'all and I don't like lopsided either way. Hopefully dev's will give y'all something back -- but the way it's been going lately their mistakes are our problems.
Ty norton I'm still waiting to see the numbers how we are stronger than you guys with 3 less members since the devs instead of posting no match up numbers need to post why they match up numbers. I think most will stop complaining about the match ups they get if they know the calculations included. But that's to simple for the devs apparently. Oh btw this is my 4th forum post in 2 1/2 years playing so I owe them a rant !