Estoc Trials - War #2 - No Match Update

Discussion in 'Past Events' started by admin, Apr 2, 2013.

  1. Pro's Con's but overall a fairer matching process. Ty devs for fixing certain exploit issues.
    Next agenda - would be nice to see a change to same/similar named clan members.

    Option - as soon as match up has happened the war actives names auto change to there current clan #number. Seems most if not all ppl use # for war. Easy fix.
     
  2. Lol.they might be the same devs i suppose.dragons elite and seals was a very fair matchup.
    Seals has 17 members with less than 20 actions.Even if you are sit upon for whole 2 hours,u can easily get 20 actions in first 5 mnts.
    Moreover i dont think seals even tried xtalling.
    Why war if you dont have xtalls? :D
     
  3. Man.. let people build up there bfa it takes longer, match up back to been all based on buildings it was better yes guild hansels ruled.. but they are a long thing to build so let it be.
     
  4. Did u seriously just say guild hansels take a long time to build?
     
  5. Kaw_admin - well... instead of comparing size of a clan and bfa individually you could rather add bfa to Raw Stats and then set a matchup. So If total raw stats of a clan with 25 members is 'X' and total BFA is 'Y' you should rather set their total strength as 'X' + 'Y' and look for a clan somewhere around that. Most people spend months increasing their bfa so that they can get advantage over opponents in war, but with your algorithm it's pointless to have big bfa.
     
  6. Wow - very informative - thx devs for the in-depth, helpful explanations - much work went in to this! We can all see that ;)
     
  7. Thanks KaW_Admin. Makes a lot more sense now on the no matches. I really appreciate the detailed descriptions
     
  8. The problem with adding BFA to raw stats and working out a match that way, as opposed to build BFA, is that GH's with large BFA will pay pennies compared to a standard build with MP ally. That in itself makes it an unfair match up.
     
  9. Build plus BFA*
     
  10. [codhttp://forum.kingdomsatwar.com/posting.php?mode=reply&f=3&t=133039#e]a :lol: :lol: [/code] so cool
     
  11. So we can only do new eb if no match? :cry:
     
  12. New idea for B2B EE:
    Split guild hansel clan equally.

    Get strong top50 ally LB for both side. This give u match up only these 2 clan.

    Open osf for losing side.

    Do 10 wars/ week with 50/50 win/lose. This give u lv70 finally. (5 lv x 4 wk, 10 lv x 2 wk, 15 lv x2 wk)

    I have this great idea, how dev stop this? If u stop B2B matching, top war rank clan will have trouble.
     
  13. Rayn - that would be part of strategy, in a war you Don't send tanks to destroy opposing tanks, you use Mines and single person weapons, we don't see soldiers whining about it, both had same strength, its just that one of them had a etter plan with higher win rate.
     
  14. **** THIS.


    Is all I will say.  Goodbye.
     
  15. KAW ADMIN I hope at this point you realize there are many worms players in kaw. So don't consider this as spamming. I dont understand why we didnt get match up today. 90% of our players had statless allies and just enough for max plunder. What did we do wrong? Is it too low this time? Please answer
     
  16. If we were the "odd man out" I'm going to LOL.
     
  17. Please have a good reason why our Worm clan didn't win.
    We dropped at least 300mil CS overnight.
    Our clan's opted-in BFA is tops 3mil CS or something.
    And we still got no match.
    Answer us!

    .̧̨̧̬̝̹̱̯̤̥̤̬̼͙͎͓̬̯̬̮̤ͅ.̧̨̧̧̢̨̧̨̨̧̗̯̥̤̬̤̯̥̭̩̟̦̣.̧̨̧̨̭̯̟̬̤̬̯̬̣̥̬̹̦̣̜̖͙ͅ.̧̨̧̡̧̨̜̭̯̦̥̣̣̝̬͙̬͙̭̯̣̭̤.̡̧̨̨̧̢̧̧̜̯̩̥̤̯̥̜̦̤̯̬̞̗͚.̧̨̧̬̝̹̱̯̤̥̤̬̼͙͎͓̬̯̬̮̤ͅ.̧̨̧̡̧̨̜̭̯̦̥̣̣̝̬͙̬͙̭̯̣̭̤.̡̧̨̨̧̢̧̧̜̯̩̥̤̯̥̜̦̤̯̬̞̗͚.̧̨̧̧̢̨̧̨̨̧̗̯̥̤̬̤̯̥̭̩̟̦̣.̧̨̧̨̭̯̟̬̤̬̯̬̣̥̬̹̦̣̜̖͙ͅ.̧̨̧̡̧̨̜̭̯̦̥̣̣̝̬͙̬͙̭̯̣̭̤.̧̨̧̬̝̹̱̯̤̥̤̬̼͙͎͓̬̯̬̮̤ͅ.̧̨̧̧̢̨̧̨̨̧̗̯̥̤̬̤̯̥̭̩̟̦̣.̧̨̧̨̭̯̟̬̤̬̯̬̣̥̬̹̦̣̜̖͙ͅ.̧̨̧̡̧̨̜̭̯̦̥̣̣̝̬͙̬͙̭̯̣̭̤.̡̧̨̨̧̢̧̧̜̯̩̥̤̯̥̜̦̤̯̬̞̗͚
    T͠͠ɧ͙ɛ
    Pɧ͍ɵɛɴ͙͝ɪx
    Returns.
    Run