@wulf usually on your side, but of the 12 clans that didn't get a matchup were us and guilds inc. we have had one war before and it was a fairly even matchup! But today we both ended up with no match up even though our numbers and size are quite similar.
So wulf. Do you think it's worth spending up to a year getting all mith equip and enchanting it to level 10? With most only being able to do 3 or so wars, and with no match ups, averaging 60 mith a war there's no way it's possible for someone to get all the equip.
Honestly it just helps smaller clans who can't win against anybody fight against another clan who can't ever win (It hurts me that you dis-agree Wulf you were my favorite mod)
Just looking for options. This wasn't a decision the devs made lightly. This was what the community asked for. Help the devs find a better way. Cause they have hears about lately is "unfair match ups waste of gold, pots, mith, and time"
It should take a very long time, yes. This game isnt meant to be done fast IMO. Remember when it took weeks to get the 3b for that last land? Anyway, here I sit not making the gold I need for my nifty new mace Come on guys, figure this one out. Bad matchups or no matchups or EXTREMELY limited rosters like (25 min 30 max) for wars are our only options atm. We need better options - make suggestions, discuss...
@Wulf Personally I'm going to write that I'm okay with this new change(since I have a reserved space on the first page I think...) My only problem is that it does waist some people's time though we players can't have everything we want
This new update is a slap in the face to all. I understand that it sucks being on the losing end of a lopsided war. But I also understand the work that goes into making sure you have everyone ready for war. And when u have busted ur ass to make sure u meet member requirements etc then it sucks just as bad knowing that you still wasted all that time preparing. This system is a huge fail on devs part. Make mith only available through war, only on weekends, and only if you are LUCKY enough to not get screwed by the devs new war system. All the while they are making us PAY and making us take our TIME to test their new fails. Let me restate in capslockrage. WE ARE PAYING WITH OUR OWN MONEY/GOLD/TIME TO HELP YOU TEST YOUR SYSTEM. we are paying you money to make you money and only getting on every week on return. It's even more disheartening knowing it's an easy solution that has been said before. Make the member limit a singular number. Ie 50 ppl. Or 60. If u have 49 or 51 then too bad u don't get to war. We don't see 11 vs 24 on the football field. Or 5 vs 12 on the basketball court. Ur match system is a failure because u are allowing so many variables to be included in the matchmaking system. Take out the number variables and you are left with merely matching up each clan of 50 base on the strength of those 50 ppl alone. Not failing to attempt what u are currently attempting and failing. If u would remove the loss of edge then it would be easy to have exactly 50 members each war. Alliances could make a WAR ONLY clan. And each war people from the alliance could all send clannies there to war til a member limit was met. But the system u have in place now is a slap on the face to everyone warring whether u got a matchup this week or not. Because u can only get mith through war and who knows if the system will fail you next week after you put so much hard work ensuring your squad is ready for a war you won't get to participate in due to the fail's of the developers
The only thing I would maybe add is give the option to the Clan owner if they want to be out of the match up or not. This will prevent all the crybabies from complaining about having a bad matchup or having a no matchup. Put the responsibility on the clan owners and then you will hear less moaning and crying as the choice is theirs. I'm just tried of all these people and their tears.
I know. Believe me I do. Few spend as much time on EE war preparations as the admins and commanders. So, I feel ya. I am sad I am not currently bashing heads in a good fight rather than trying to steer this forum toward solutions & brainstorming rather than people just working on their level 5 Waaaa achievement. :mrgreen:
Lion reason why he's gotten so much mith is because- He was first statless with just lvl 3 castle, apparently smaller you are more mith payout..? He was doing 200 actions a war and burning huge amounts of pots to get all that mith since estocs has been released
So how does this system benefit players like me who only like to war? I personally hate ebs don't like hitting repeat action and watching a little blue bar move, I hate this update I would rather be on the losing side of a 20 v 100 war then not getting to war.
Ok - so 2 options suggested so far are: 1 - Tiny brackets. (which I dont see how that will work considering strength AND size are collected) 2 - Remove no-match system and allow Clan owner to "cancel wars" after matchup but before start.
78 clans doing EE is pathetic. Considering the amount of clans there are, there DEFINATELY needs to be wars for just say 10-20 players... Trust me I'd find this more fun. You'd actually be familiar with your team and work together more. You'd have no strangers in the clan and more people would be doing it so there is more chance of a match up.
For option 2 if the clan removes itself from the match what happens to the other clan? Are they sol? Or put back into match making?