Estoc Trials - Community Poll

Discussion in 'Past Events' started by admin, Apr 7, 2013.

?

Will you support tighter clan size restrictions for wars?

  1. Yes

    46 vote(s)
    23.1%

  2. No

    153 vote(s)
    76.9%
Page 2 of 11
  1. Poll
    Will you support tighter clan size restrictions for wars?
    Yes:
    36 votes (23%)

    No:
    121 votes (77%)

    Total:
    157 votes

    Made for non-pc users to see current poll. Updating every hour. :)
    Last updated:
    9:20am EDT
     
    #21 Resilience, Apr 7, 2013
  2. Devs: Make the 2 boundary limits available for all wars..So you have two different groups of clans.
    If that happens, I support :)
     
    #22 I_I_I-DarkAce07-I_I_I, Apr 7, 2013
  3. Support
     
    #23 Eagle, Apr 7, 2013
  4. Ditto
     
    #24 iiWARzz, Apr 7, 2013
  5. Then in effect, we just halved the signups, making matchups even harder :(
     
    #25 kaw_admin, Apr 7, 2013
  6. No support. Those new member numbers may be more difficult to attain for a lot of clans possibly.
     
    #26 hacked_account_FOFF_Devs, Apr 7, 2013
  7. Or, you could make the wars more accessible to all players by making a war crystal system to increase overall participation, thus more choices to create better match ups for everybody. Heres the thread that details the idea, plus a "petition" showing outstanding support for this idea from the community.

    the thread which I'm sure you've seen but will post anyways
     
    #27 homedawg76, Apr 7, 2013
  8. Do a trial test. Support for experimenting, I guess.
     
    #28 3141592, Apr 7, 2013
  9. ^^^that and 30 min Regen :)
     
    #29 Chop-Suey, Apr 7, 2013
  10. I would like the idea if there were possibly 3-5 different size matchup pools in the same round, such as
    1. 18-22
    2. 28-32
    3. 38-42
    4. 48-52
    5. 58-62

    This would give all sizes of clan the opportunity to participate with all of its members willing to war.
     
    #30 P1GGYMAN, Apr 7, 2013
  11. Support
     
    #31 Warlord_infinity, Apr 7, 2013
  12. Such small numbers will make it tough for big clans to get everyone in every other war. As it is right now, we have to rotate to give everyone a turn to war.
    No support
    I like the 35-45 and occasional 50 max limit.
     
    #32 Resilient_BMAN44-IS-, Apr 7, 2013
  13. How about take off badges we didn't earn?


    I gave feedback on how I never joined a Rancor war just had the spell activated and got it.


    Please remove it!
     
    #33 Aries, Apr 7, 2013
  14. Enough with the restrictions already !

    Get some proper gear and a real programmer instead.

    Why do you seek that 1860 war style so eagerly ?
    Line 30 men up on each side, aim, shoot.
    Where is the fun in that ?

    If you wanna change the game constantly, you should seek to incorporate more strategy and make knowledge more decisive.

    whats next ? 5 vs 5 wars for players with CS between 10,0m and 10,1 and BFA between 500B and 5001B, and most have 12 equips of which no more than 3 can be red equips ?

    In the old days where we fought 60-70 peeps on each side .. now THAT was a war.
     
    #34 DennyCrane_in_BaconPants, Apr 7, 2013
  15. NO
     
    #35 ER-BARCODE-_-BASHER-NM1, Apr 7, 2013
  16. No I don't support further micro-managing the clan size for wars. The current limitations are sufficient. 
     
    #36 AppLeGirL, Apr 7, 2013
  17. No it is fine as it is
     
    #37 --Rylan, Apr 7, 2013
  18. No Support.
     
    #38 PhartacusX, Apr 7, 2013
  19. If there is no no-match, don't change the max, but with no-match system, any clan wants to try 40 ppl?
    if you dont support, sign up 40 ppl with your clan, see if you can get a match.
     
    #39 llI-_-R_lISlUlPIElRlIl_H-_-llI, Apr 7, 2013
  20. No... season is underway.
     
    #40 erbaj, Apr 7, 2013
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 2 of 11