Estoc Trials - Community Poll

Discussion in 'Past Events' started by admin, Apr 7, 2013.

?

Will you support tighter clan size restrictions for wars?

  1. Yes

    46 vote(s)
    23.1%
  2. No

    153 vote(s)
    76.9%
  1. Not in favor of the higher clan size range/restriction on the weekends. People have commitments and scraping 25 can be hard enough especially the 10pm edt ee
     
  2. ESTOCS .... S.M.A.
     
  3. For those hung up on strategy, this change would remove a portion of strategy from these wars. Pre war strategy is determining who will be warring in many clans, and how many. That strategy plays into your matchup. If your strategy is wrong, you get no match or a very tough one. This change would really make every clan try to max at the top end of the tiny window, the only way to be sure you won't be outnumbered. Don't take this part of the strategy out of the wars. No support.
     
  4. Do not support
     
  5. No support. It's fine the way it is. These changes would cause us to deny even more clannies from warring due to the small roster limit window.
     
  6. No support
     
  7. IMO all this has started after the No Match Up system came up.
    There were only complaints about bad matchups earlier.
    If you are making Matchup easy for your clan,its a part of strategy too.
    The other clans are not banned or something to do the same.If guild hansels make matchup better,get them.there r plenty of them finding war clans everyday on world chat.
    I still want only 1 thing that is to remove this No Match System.
     
  8. How about a two tier war system. Tier 1 for clan size 15-30 and tier 2 for clan size of 40-60
     
  9. Keep it how it is please
     
  10. @kaw_admin

    Make it 10-100 since you have the no match system in place.
     
  11. Having Friday-Sunday wars at 36-40 people would be very difficult. It is higher than most clans are typically using now. If all wars were 28-32, it would be very nice.
     
  12. Make it 28-32 all wars plz 36-40 fri-sun will cause less clans to participate
     
  13. I say minimum of 20 max of 40....
     
  14. I support it it's a great idea hope it works out. Now I need to find a war clan to join
     
  15. I also say stop worrying about clans size ... It's fine the way it is ,.... Start working on the lag problem and the booting problems during war ..... 3 of my member got booted the second they xstaled and couldn't get back on for 3mins in the last war ... You have it right as of now ... Why not worry about what matters
     
  16. I say we go back to the old system. Clan sizes of 25-100 and removing the "No Match" scenario would make for more matches. Granted you will still have a few clans complaining about their matchups, but everyone would be able to participate and work towards something. As it stands the are good clans out there who can't seem to get a matchup now because of restrictions. Increasing restrictions will just push more people away. And maybe make the new eb accessable to the losing clans, so they will have a little head start on the mith for the next war.
     
  17. I like 25 minimum .. 36 is very hard and you will see much less sign ups.