Devs please respond to EE war future

Discussion in 'Wars' started by HTLFreak, Oct 14, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Move on, I am not concerned about your opinions or questions or informing you on what I know and how I know it; I am more concerned about the MAJORITY of warriors wanting to war in round or primal wars without having to worry about a very lopsided match up.
     
  2. I have...care to guess what their response was? I will give you a hint, was generic and unhelpful. My guess is they think that wars do not bring in enough money for them to be concerned with anymore.
     
  3. Because they're running a multimillion dollar business and should be able to handle criticism. They aren't just some guy on a forum. This is the most ridiculous excuse for devs I see on a regular basis. They're professionals and part of their job is customer service.
     
  4. I can't remember the last time that devs posted on a thread regarding legitimate concerns. They say that they're in contact with the community, but that is complete garbage. They don't listen to our opinions or our criticisms, and I've gotten used to it. That's what you gotta do. They won't respond, except with the generic "we will look into it" or "email concerns at ______".
     
  5. You actually just verified his post.

    Front is right though, all EE adjustments have made some people happy and some people mad. Rinse and repeat. Some of you keep doing them but were never happy with them. Some people want devs to create more players who care about EE because obviously they can program people to enjoy it.

    While I understand that some of you want guidance on where it's going I have to agree with Front. If they are blowing all of you off it's because no matter what they tried they always were the bad guys for trying it. Always.
     
  6. In no way did I verify his post, I simply stated that the devs had made a few failed attempts. It goes without saying the devs cannot make 100% of the players happy or even close to that percentage, based on your and fronts' logic they should go ahead and shut the game down now due to every event and change they try there is a group of people that are unhappy with it.

    The number of people warring speaks for itself, I for one will not be spending any more money on this game until I know what direction primal and round wars are heading. The only reason I played this game is to grow bigger on the EBs and war.

    I understand that a good matchup system is very complicated to achieve because of all the variables. From what I have experienced, the toughest variable to overcome is the unlimited BFA combined with the virtually unlimited ways rosters can be created. Due to these variables I see that when making the match up system strict enough to create fair matches it will also result in an exponential number of no matches. The only way I can see around this problem is for there to be certain categories of rosters that people can cast with certain CS limits. In my opinion in order for there to be an effective match up system there must be limits imposed in roster types or a low limit in BFA to limit the possibility of rosters. Primal wars started to do this but the underlying matchup system is preventing this from being an effective warring system. The problem with primal wars is they do away with the hard earned BFE and BFA. Another reason the matchup system is becoming more of a problem is because when it was originally created accounts could not be nearly as big as they are which kept the size gap between accounts from being so massive. Now that builds can be so much bigger the gap between builds creates an even bigger variance in rosters.

    Due to these issues it is understandable why the devs appear to have given up on primal and round wars and this is also why this thread is not about trying to keep them or do away with them, it is simply an attempt to get information on what direction the devs are taking as it pertains to primal and round wars.
     
  7. So many players have tried contacting support with suggestions on how wars can be improved. Myself included. What do the Devs do? They run Event after Event after Event.

    Yes. The war system needs attention. For many of us it's why we play Kaw. If the Devs think that War Warriors don't spend they should try building a kingdom with towers for War! Warriors spend loads trying to keep their builds War Worthy. Who spends the most on Events? Warriors do. Why? To earn the rewards to remain in touch with other Warriors. What the Devs fail to grasp is that without Wars, they will lose their income stream. This is nothing short of idiotic. The Warriors need a reason to keep their builds relevant. Wars are what does this. If the Devs ignore the need to fix the War system, they risk losing a huge part of their income. It's not true that Wars do not bring in revenue. Indirectly this is happening everyday in HTE clans all over Kaw.

    Watch this space! Lose Wars and lose your income Devs. Mark my words. We've asked. We've pleaded. Now bring the Warriors a War system that works. Because without it, you will lose so many of the big spenders in the game.

    If Indi is your answer then have the guts to say so! But my guess is, if Clan Wars disappear, so will the Warriors who enjoy this aspect of the game. You will lose the Cash Cow that you value so much!
     
  8. You're right. THEY are running it. And I would personally take their long standing silence over this matter as a sign that THEY don't feel like answering to the criticism anymore. You mad? Guess not, you are still here......


    Nice response, maybe you should join the circus and run for president. That's a solid gold deflection and power move lol

    All I wanted was sharks with freakin laser beams attached to their heads, but the Devs wouldn't give me that. Honestly, what do we pay these people for! Maybe I should make a tearjerker thread to
     
  9. Please lock, I consider that LL War announcement as response to the direction to EE war future.

    /lock
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.