With commas makes u sound like you're disagreeing and then agreeing. Like Poster1: love me a bit of cat claw soup Posted2: no, support As if, no i disagree with loving a bit of cat claw soup. But, support, i agree with loving it
I disagree with that. You are stating your disagreement first, followed by a counterexample/correction. For example: "No, it's not" - you are stating your disagreement and then correcting it. In "no, support" you are once again making a correction. However in the thread's context it's just a nonsense statement
Devil im not quite sure what u said :lol: Larry, dat took me a few moments to realise the second meaning xD
Consider the comma as a dividing line between the statement. "No, support" would have the same meaning as "I disagree, for it is actually support"