Best Idea Ever? How to fix kaw!

Discussion in 'Strategy' started by --BuLLETs_MaCHiNE--, Jun 13, 2012.

  1. Definitely support this 

    Sorry for all my alts posting before me. My multiple personality disorder gets the best of me sometimes

    Again support. Spy builds need to have ally plunder or something to lose building wise. Even allow strips of ally slots that everyone will need to buy back if they choose they would like allies again.

    KotFE-MaCHiNE
    ORiGiN oF tHe MaCHiNES
     
  2. Ohhhhhh snap. Wash put y'all on spin cycle.
     
  3. Great idea,you should be able to steal equipment and destroy buildings,just make it so that if you have a building thats been destroyed,you can bring it back at whatever level it was for1/4 of its cost,thatway its fair
     
  4. Anyway I support, Swe you guys out there 
     
  5. Not really for it, except for being able to steal equipment. Make it way easier to get some shiny stuff. Lol
     
  6. What about RL? I like the idea but really? What about people that only do EBs? iG will just destroy there whole kingdom. Plus your practically saying if you go to school or have a job you'll loose your builds, lands, and equipment?
     
  7. Maybe instead of being fully destroyed buildings could just be damaged and cause reduced status?
     
  8. Yeah Templar I agree with that actually. So it's not like ur totally devastated. But still feeling the sting from the war 
     
  9. No!!!!! Noob idea
     
  10. To fix Kaw u need some duct tape
     
  11. :shock: I support you my brother, er me, er you uh god the voices :? :eek: but ya I'm full spy too with no fear it need to change so bring it muffin let's see you face the wrath of the machine army in all its glory :twisted:
     
  12. Should be called
    "Worst idea ever? How to destroy Kaw!"
    Newbs would be pinned never get anywhere, middle level would get pinned and again not get anywhere. Only clans like iG, Zaft, Monster Garage, Foxes, AotS clans would survive (sorry if you have a strong clan that I didn't mention. These were the first that came to mind) It would be an unwelcoming environment to new players and it would basically be if you aren't a lb player just quit. Kaw would lose like 90% of its players, so overall a pretty horrible idea
     
  13.  clown btw support for them crazy machines KotFE
     
  14. Hey silver. Since u are so new to the game plz don't post anymore. We are looking for constructive criticism. Which u have none of 
     
  15. How about:
    8 attack buildings or lower means 1 building a day can be destroyed

    9 attack buildings means that 1 building may be "unusable" for 24 hours (stats are decreased as if building didn't exist, but then it comes back)
     
  16. Silver is just plain wrong... And that's not a very good list of top clans.
     
  17. I agree with Poison. If something like this does happen make it temporarly unusable not destroyed
     
  18. Silver this is an A to B conversation I'd suggest to C yourself out of it
     
  19. Silver you just said you didn't like the idea. So no bandwagon jumping.

    I also like the idea of 1/4 cost for rebuild. Your looking at about 8b per SOS (for example) then. Which is a decent amount to save up if your not so active during osw.

    Negative side - most people will have at least 20b banked in att pots, therefore this would technically negate the effort put into destroying a build.

    Positive side- you would then be depleting "personal banks" as I like to call them.

    I do see silvers point in the context of, say an alliance decided to beat down on one clan- you could focus on admins and owners and force a cf fairly quickly. But in rebuttal, in which RL war scenario in midevil times, we're buildings not torched, foundations broken through brute force? In short - suck it up Pansy's.