The philosopher, the fact that you posted on page 4 that u hadn't told the whole story, then presented a so called fact with no evidence, takes away from your credibility. I for one will read your future threads with a suspicious eye
IG doesn't have smart ppl that's not our problem. Its part of the requirement to join IG. They follow the shiny light into the LR volcano . 4T is a small strip even if tats was on he couldn't have done anything. We r currently stripping another 3T from IG piggies bank it will gone soon see if u can stop it. Fair warning, won't help hahahaha
Its not brilliant, she's abusing her role and she abused another players trust. Brilliant would be figuring out someone's online times the old fashioned way, not using an opportunity only available to mods as a weapon.
My views on this: 1. Brilliant Strategy - messaging to see if online. However, saying you "sent in a note" to ATA that was found to be a lie is not the way to go. Now ATA probably is wondering what other things she has lied about. I'm still waiting for some smart comeback/lie to see how she gets out of this one. 2. Abusing her Moderator Status - messaging concerning a problem She messaged this player concerning his concern with someone bypassing (spamming?) on his wall and a day later she tells him she sent in a note concerning his problem. Well that was a lie; why couldn't she just have asked if the devs had gotten back to him? But no, she had to go ahead and look like she "cared" enough about it by lying. Which in turn if he was online he probably would have replied, due to his non-response she used it as he was asleep to then strip him. 3. Breaking the ToU - she's done this multiple times -Falsely accusing someone of account sharing without proof - PUBLICLY (need I stress that anymore?) -Sharing a Private Message on forums which contained personal info -The list goes on and on As a previous moderator (on a different game) the ToU's are all relatively the same in content, many differ depending on the game and the game rating. But all ToU's are generally similar; I have seen a moderator do almost exactly what Bellemorte is doing here and when the players contacted support showing evidence of what has been done that moderator was de-modded. However it took half the community sending in emails to them complaining about that moderator, creators of games have to listen to the community as the community pays for their paycheck. I was told of these emails (just general info, no personal info was given) and was told to watch said moderator, finding them in the wrong I had reported them. All in all it seems if the community wants Bellemortes moderator ability gone then action must be taken, not threads in forums because they can just be graveyarded by her. You want her gone? Send in a complaint to ATA; include what you've seen and how it breaks the ToU. Not just argue on a thread about it...
@ big I didn't post the middle ss at first because it had stuff about the actual case. I also didn't see it as brig necessary to the story I was telling. However, when questions were brought up about if belle did anything at all, I posted what I could to disprove this. That's all that is to it. Go take your rant somewhere else.
The only problem with Belles actions is that she lied about sending a note to ATA. The rest of her plan is pure-evil-powerabusing-mod trickery. What will get her in trouble is this lie. ATA will simply check her emails to them, which they have done apparently, and see she is lying. This puts you in a really crappy position. What's unrecoverable though is her loss of face and the fact that KaW now knows that they can't trust her anymore. You have let the evil sisterhood down Belle and you will probably bring Wulfie down with you because he acted with you. Sooooo sad.
@surfer Remember this is war. Belle just needed some sort of excuse to pm tat without raising his suspicion. Is that so bad? I'm not sure.