I agree with everyone else that bfe should remain static throughout. How about making EE actually increase plunder by the percentage stated? Anybody else notice that none of them are right and the increase in lower than stated? If anything, it should be to encourage participation. Most non-SH who war have plunder severely reduced by towers. There is very little incentive to EE for most because they can make the same by not building towers and doing ebs.
Scaling bfe with these new hf towers will make it extremely difficult to get through most EE builds from pin KC
The only reason to do ee IS FOR THE BFE!! Take it away and you might as well take away ee all together
We'll definitely be bringing these changes into place during the Chaos Wars and hope to get things fully ironed out before we proceed into any sort of season. In regards to setting a hard lock on Ally Bonus, as stripping allies is a part of strategy in wars while this idea is something we've considered we're going to try to avoid forcing a lock at this time. I'll discuss this further with the devs though so we can have the system make sense and easy to understand when it's out.
I'm ashamed of u being from taka and all ... The reason to do ee shouldn't be about equip the rewards are part of wat corrupted the system to begin with ... Ee should be done for fun and as a test of wit and skill making all about the reward is wat started the whole decline of any good thing anywhere And being from taka u should know ! those guys durning season 1 were fun to match we had a great time and afterwards could be friends and visit because we could enjoy the good matches the even fights when u were lucky enough to get one Now it's just about winning something ? Not enjoying the actually play of the game? I guess I should have figured that's wat brought about all the stacking bull anyway... I hope ur clannies see that remark and can remind u wat it means to be part of real fun matches not just a means to try to get a reward
Stripping allies is part of wars. Did not know ur supposed to do this in ee. Noobs really hv a chance then
I see statements that the "playing field should be leveled", meaning a mid with no bfa should be on equal footing with an ally lb account. Lol NO. Life isn't fair and this is a growth, money oriented game. You don't get free rides. Put the time and or money into your account and you to can be a lb. BFE should be percentage based on stats, to encourage growth. The days of the bfe heavy sh accounts should come to an end. How many of those accounts are truly "beginners" anyways? Lol We all know they aren't. My clan has faced clans with those super sh that drop bfa at match up and are dtw to then suddenly hire trillions from their alt that was holding the allies and become able to hit huge attacks and lb accounts. I support locking bfa at match up, what you sign up with , you war with. There is no legit strategy involving cheating. Sorry but dropping bfa IS cheating. The changes the devs propose look promising. Bring the fun back to EE and a lot more clans will be signing up.
I am all for nerfing SH, I just don't want to upgrade and find out I can't war till I'm build complete with 10 tril in allies. Nerfing SH is good, but does this really help Mids?
I like most of the stuff here and I'm excited for a change....any change cuz it's broken right now. My question though is why are tiny guys warring with huge guys in the first place? That's the issue I see most complained about. LB / SH stacking sucks. Just make two war systems, duplicate the current one. Make the big boy level where you have to be over 12m CS and make the small level for accounts under 12m CS. Instant hit ratio and matchup solution. Top level gets more rewards, more EE bonus, better goodies, etc. give folks the incentive to move up to the big boy level and promote growth.
Yeah id be ashamed if i was you too. Of course ee is done for bfe. If you just enjoy the war then stick to a system war between two clans
Went through all you are planning to do, and I'm sure there will be plenty of other holes that will come out of all the amazing fixes y'all plan. My question and I'm sure they will go unanswered. 1) worst problem of all's stacked clans, stacked " 2 to 3 top 100 LB with 2 mids and rest GH/SH" eg of such Rising Hawks, Perkutut Army, Dragons Santuary, Ghost Legions etc. I'm sure you get the idea. Doing this brings down CS of the whole clan and they match up clans with mid size builds where their LB chew on them and the mids fail to win against them. If we try to hit GH they pay crap. Having said all that. Q) what are you doing to rectify this issue? I Have not seen any thing in your proposed fixes that will help this. 2) there are GH/SH with Hugh BFA they can hit any size mids in the opponent clan and it does not matter if they get through (win or loose), they just scout the heck outa mid size build and dump troops on them to make them easy targets for their bigger builds. This again makes it easy for the bigger players in that clan to plunder off the opposite side. Q) why cant y'all cap any one that does not have a minimum number of T4 buildings on HL?? 3) DTW/DTS can this be some how made such that top 500 kingdoms can only fight amongst them and not hit any lower, and GH/SH can only hit bases on their building strength and not based on their BFA. Q) can you limit this, and if not why?? I can go on with question, as there are many but I'd at least like to get the answers to above, as I did not see any thing being done to help with this stacking issue. Let's see what ya got to say.
Personally I think locking bfa only half solves the issue - lbs no more manipulation by having trillions out b4 match and hiring allies after match and sh selling allies after match so they are dtw. Further things that need to be considered: - I think a further step needs to be taken. If bfe is no longer static in EEwars then bfa should also be longer static. I'm just putting this out there because the devs reasoning for making bfe no longer static can be applied to bfa as well. Personally, I think bfa should be capped - possibly 100m per category. This is because bfa would skew wars as bfe becomes irrelevant in wars. But if they make make bfe non-static then then should do so w bfa as well.
Im not entirely sure that I understand - Making the equip bonus SCALE to the amount of troops? So you're making equip bonuses NON STATIC? Well there goes the usefulness of gathering all these equips and they'd be useless when I have no troops...