An Update on Season 5 + Wars!

Discussion in 'Past Announcements' started by [ATA]Grant, Jun 25, 2015.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Re: An Update on Season 5 Wars!

     
  2. Re: An Update on Season 5 Wars!

    Personally i like the 30 war company group. Make more groups for war. You ask for 50 so your clan has nearly 2 war companies
     

  3. Talk is empty. Before you criticize my suggestion, have the argument to back YOUR own suggestion. What does your majesty Silencio suggest for devs?
     
  4. Your majesty has made plenty of suggestions. I deem thee worthy of going back and reading.

    Your fifty man company is nonsensical. I explained why that is. You didn't understand and tried to call me out looking stupid in the process.

    King Silencio I
     
  5. Re: An Update on Season 5 Wars!

    This makes it so that all rewards are only available to popular war people who have all the time in he world. What about including indi with set times through various time zones so everyone can war. People with buys schedules can't be in a war company because they can't guarantee that they will be on with random war times. I like the rewards idea and playoffs, but the companies will only accept certain people and those who are interested in starting to participate in wars will be unable to.
     
  6. You have your own reasoning, which I see no need to read back and waste time, you can have your own reasoning whatever it was.

    I mentioned 50 man company and I also explained why I mentioned it, so I don't see why am I even bothering explaining to a dimwit. Please don't reply me anymore, I can't handle your ignorance

    Have a good day.
     
  7. Re: An Update on Season 5 Wars!

    Only thing that's going to come of this is people stacking rosters obviously and many people being turned away bc the clan leaders don't like their builds. Indi wars have to be apart of this season if it's going to be successful. Debs after all the threads and ideas in forums you must be special to come up with this mess. I know you said proposal, but you should know in the first place this isn't going to work.
     
  8. I wholeheartedly reject this entire proposal.

    Make season 5 indi war only if you want it to be fair.

    Removing indi wars is the most absurd idea you guys could have come up with. They have the highest turnout/participation for a reason.

    Everything about this proposal is bad in every way.
     
  9. Nice argument.

    King Silencio 1

    Florence 0
     
  10. Re: An Update on Season 5 Wars!

    Will you confirm we won't see a return of Lb/ssh/sh and very high LB/ps rosters?

    Although I prefer longer war types most have built schedules around 1hr wars, there is added prep time don't forget

    Multiple timezones require a bigger war company than 30

    Once we are locked into a company does this mean our stats are locked and recorded or are we able to perform build adjustments/upgrades?

    Is the current estocs edge bonus still included?
     
  11. Re: An Update on Season 5 Wars!

    Agree. Multiple timezones require a bigger war company than 30. Especially where skirmish we won't know the timezones.

    Exactly the point I've been trying to make but CERTAIN dumbwit above you argued otherwise~ :roll: :lol:
     
  12. That's king Silencio to you, peasant. Just because thirty doesn't work doesn't mean 50 will either. Try to get it through your head why that is.
     
  13. Re: An Update on Season 5 Wars!

    Though im sure devs have discussed fixes, its usually up to the players. Primal was a solution, its now a stacked mess like round
     
  14. Re: An Update on Season 5 Wars!

     
  15. Re: An Update on Season 5 Wars!

    There is basically only 1 type of stacked primal roster. They have no skill or strategy & always do the same thing. They run 12-15 hansels with 1 troop building & have their hansels failbomb enemy tanks with attacks so the enemy can't plunder them & since they take heavy troop loss failing, they can unload their troops in 10sec or so. They continue to fail bomb troops @ every regen so they can (almost) never be attacked. Then they either ass or steal the other team down. When the other team comes up from ko they have no one to sko on cause the noob exploiters keep their troops 0.

    Easy fix:
    If a player fails an attack on you, you earn 25% of the plunder you would have earned had you attacked the player attacking you & the attacker loses 5% of their own plunder per fail.

    That will stop crappy clans from appearing to be good & winning solely based on the fact that they use 13-15 hansels. That will fix primals.
     
  16. Re: An Update on Season 5 Wars!

    Primals really aren't that much of a stacked mess that u make them out to be, the stacked hansel roster is very much beatable and clans such as D1 have proved this by beating the hansel roster many times
     
  17. Re: An Update on Season 5 Wars!

    I'd like to remind kaw community of the era it has created ...... Hte! More people than ever are now wandering kaw because if you want to compete, keep up and conform to the 'accepted build' as far as growth and maintaining tower growth in line with new lands etc you really do have to flit between fast dragon eb clans and b2b hte clans.
    I just think it's a little too late to be promoting clan rivalry as far as ee goes when clan loyalty was ruined with this new era you created!
    As a community we should all be able to compete in a season, indi's provided an excellent way to self manage our time and participation whilst continuing with our own personal kaw goals.
     
  18. Where's the indi?
     
  19. Re: An Update on Season 5 Wars!

    I like the proposals. But I am curious of the Max CS cap, does this take into consideration bfa? Will BFE also be figured into the cap, or is it solely based on raw stats. This may have been answers in previous post, but there are 60 pages. And for me, my day is too busy to read all of them.
     
  20. Re: An Update on Season 5 Wars!

    I'd appreciate it if kaw admin could answer these questions, especially the first one...
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.