devs probably implemented the losses bc of high-end players for more huge losses (but not really sure about that tbh) ... at least they did not consider that the bigger ones get back a lot more though than any small players in any case ... if there was a min lvl for the less riches that would make sense ... but as I don't assume that devs aren't capable of calculations it rather seems to be meant as a feature for rising the gap than avoiding it ... either way the gap can neither be stopped nor imbalanced at all at current stage of "game mechanics" ... it's getting worse DAILY ...
Bullet, are you serious? I have single allies more expensive than all yours put together. I have a couple crap allies that are inactive but they're both under 100b. Not that big of a problem. But when "they leave the game" that's not my fault so why should I pay for it?
Ancienne the point you miss is this has always hurt the smaller new player more than the bigger accounts. I could have every ally reset now and it would t destroy my game one bit. Most players especially at the too have suffered losses in strips it's not that big a deal. What hurts is the newer player still growing that has to buy inactives because they can't afford better or active accounts. Even if devs capped 100% refunds at 50b an ally that would help smaller players massively. There is no real debate as to who gets hurt the most. Just the reason that they get their growth hurt by a non player based decision which would largely affect inexperienced players.
Agreed fully justifiable request, those who reset on their own 60% is enough but for those who get deleted should give back the whole price it is unfair on the person who owns said ally to be screwed over with what they get returned
EMP you just didn't reach the "phase" I already reached ... "concentrate on inactives!" is past already, too ... now it's "NO BFA at all for YOU!" as even my carefully picked inactives get hired ... no respect of my alts either although they did reach prices which can't be earned by epics easily ... especially when they get volleyed 5x in a row ... calculate the "fallback money" you need for that at a price of 700b, please ... when I tried to remind everyone of THIS no one believed me ... but ANY of you will live this for sure as long as "it is allowed" ... I've had enough patient by now ... I started "from scratch" eight(!!!) times ... and NOW I am sure that it won't EVER be different to me in here ... and to all others who "just can't" hire back ... do you even understand what I'm talking of ... "there is no abuse" ... "there are no perm victims" ... that's all a lie ... look at allies of players like my owner ... MOST left the game ... mine are inactive, too ... BUT I bought them when they already were inactive ...
Anc, have you any idea how many times people in those recently ended osw's have been stripped, have had to start over? Probably more than once. Hell some probably more than ten times.
your insultings don't touch me anymore ... I anyway am in a "perm osw" with a contract killer of KAW atm ... there are players who hire allies to get rid of them only ...
There aren't enough actives and or pro pack allies to go around all of kaw. There are by far more inactives then there are actives.
I dont normally post on necro bumped threads but alas its a popular topic. No support. It is a risk you take for free income when an ally sells.
instead of worrying about the gold losses you should start worrying about growing chances ... especially BFA ...