@Frog, not a bad idea but still prone to obvious issues. But is seems to be a step in the right direction concerning the "super accounts" vs the rest of us in KAW. Appreciate your feedback and ideas as always. Happy KAW'ing bro.
Have Indy 'no bfa' wars, if there isn't a lb match then don't match, or if there is no fair fix, and you get a crap match (your going to get crap matchups), and your obviously the losing team, don't mith, don't x-tal, put in a few hits to avoid broken sword....go get ice cream, or go to the water park, macrame some shorts, whatever floats your boat. Not worth 'agonizing' over a lopsided kaw matchup.
Frog you are so awesome and full of yourself. Why do you need it fixed. Someone as yourself should be able to overcome these odds.
Frogs point is a good one imo. You either cap bfa or cancel it out completely. Managing the problem of stats by giving the other team many more fairly large hits doesn't fix the problem. It's still a tilt of strength on the lb side, but a tilt of actions of the other teams side. Successful actions are what win wars.
Frog is attempting a way to balance rosters more equally on the top tier. No attempt to curb bfa that the LB have spent years n money on building. He cites top LB only n the effect on match ups it creates. Nobody is complaining but there is a need to address this in some form.
Frog is right though this is a trend and very hard to overcome. It can be done but takes some luck and a great team
Usually there is anywhere from 4-6 ps on the top lb side and only 1-3 on opposite team. Then there is the issue where though your top 10 can do massive damage 1 person is easily scouted to zero spy fast then fail attacked with weaks, leaks, and from pin. This greatly reduces their impact. On the other side there is usually 4-6 lb all high cs high bfa and much larger then the cr 2 down on opposite side. Many disadvantages to these situations.
Would rather not.. sucks as much as cheese. Its just a idea to test a hansel build rather than ps. Its boring for a ps.
Just did he last indi. There were 6 spy builds in it: 2 ps and 4 Hansels. Thinking rationally, that means 3 on each side, right? So what do the devs do? We get 5 while our opponents get only one ps. Since its indi, they plundered the crap out of our Hansels and that was that. In what world does that make sense?
I believe that with the dynamics of how many build variances out there it is rather impossible to make indi wars 100% even. It isn't done on purpose to stack the deck against certain players but argumentatively it is the responsibility of the opposing clan to team up with the best strategy possible to turn their disadvantage against their opponent. This is not always possible and when your hands are tied I can understand the outrage and frustration but pointing fingers at devs doesn't mean you are right either. If someone else comes up with a better match making algorithm and submit t to devs and it works better than what is already in place then I believe you are pro-actively solving a solution versus making a forum and expecting someone else to do the work for you. Just my humble opinion. Thanks.
Remember it's never gunna be even, s1 been closest season yet for even teams IMO, but it seems u got alot of time on ur hands n think alot, so just think of a strategy to work from either side. I'm sure you'll end up on both.
This happens all the time dont know why they cant put equal amount of builds on each team only then will it be truly fair