While there are thousands of papers published that go against what you say, I don't see a very strong argument presented here. Magma isn't the sole thing that dating can be run against. Not sure if you are bringing this forth for the sake of debate, or if this is what you truly believe.
I'm just debating on this, I'm reading and learning while I'm posting/reading other people's posts. However, I know I'm not wrong. There isn't a 100% fact about dating
Re: A Theo logical Question/Debate. you are so right if we dont see it with our own eyes theres no way to tell if somethings there (giggle)
What are you guys nazis or communist? What you are doing is absolutely wrong. It inspires religious persecution. Especially when you do it in the name of science? Science I have never seen any of you talk about without links any can find on a initial google search. You guys are no show on science threads, as rare as they are. Seems a little ignorant. In mind and action.
It would be different, but this community doesn't talk technical science. So it is fair to say you aren't really scientific. Or interested. If you were we would have science threads all the time. You would be teaching science. Not hate.
None of you are fit for a lead role in any community. I really hope this is the only place your voices have a presence. You guys are see through. *giggle* : )) At least do some science thread, with some active convo. Rocket appliances!!
On top of all that. You are scared to do Muslim threads, but not Christian based threads. They fear the jihad!! Those bombs go boom! Straight *****
He is in his own private Idaho. At any rate there certainly is something seriously wrong with him, and that's something we all can agree on.