A new Incentive to "war"

Discussion in 'Strategy' started by Hansel, Oct 6, 2011.

Page 5 of 6
  1. Support


    ....and show us your tits
     
    #81 M3AT_WHISTL3, Oct 7, 2011
  2. I dunno Hansel... I feel like this game could become a huge scramble, playing in constant fear and such (for newbies, Hansel-builds, etc.).
    Maybe I don't like it because I'm just a noobish plunder-hoarder :)

    I'm sure with enough refinement, this idea will become really great for this game. But don't just try to pass the idea off as is.
     
    #82 *Resquall (01), Oct 7, 2011
  3. Hansel dont like your ideas but teach me how to be you.
     
    #83 JulioCesarChaaaaaavez, Oct 7, 2011
  4. Agree, Currently this idea would suck, certain builds would get raped, and everyone will go defensive.

    But with enough refinement, I believe this can change the game and for the better.
     
    #84 Hansel, Oct 7, 2011
  5. Ok yes i agree that is very logical that the more money defender has out, more more money the ataker should recieve.
     
    #85 JulioCesarChaaaaaavez, Oct 7, 2011
  6. Just a question, don't we get most of our money from attacking and killing the enemy's pesents? And taking gold from babies? Isn't that how warfare is always conducted?
     
    #86 DarkwarriorJ, Oct 7, 2011
  7. I support this for attack but not for steals. Spies are too overpowered already, and if this was implemented, why would anyone want to be a vulnerable attack build? Everyone would want to be an invulnerable ally-less pure spy. As already stated, spies can assassinate your troops and steal the **** out of you and you dont know who did it, unless you have crazy ally bonus, and if this was introduced, that amount in allies needed to defend yourself would leave you wide open to stripping.
    Just my opinion.
     
    #87 Horizon, Oct 7, 2011
  8. Yeah, pwars are gone, but nerd the spies some more IMO 
     
    #88 runnybunny, Oct 7, 2011
  9. Spies already take ALOT less money than attacks. A possible way to "nerf" this, is to put a DTW on spies too... =/, But that will totally destroy stripping.
     
    #89 Hansel, Oct 7, 2011
  10. No no no hansel, you've got it wrong. Take out DTW for atks but make it so that troops and spies can't fall below 20% no matter what! On and increase gold earned and loss rates, makes the game more fun.
    Check my ideas, maybe you can use my ideas to refine yours.
    Edit: sorry, I ment no below 20% by being attacked, but you can use it down to 0 if you are attacking, like reserve forces.
     
    #90 DarkwarriorJ, Oct 7, 2011
  11. Boobies
     
    #91 lootninja, Oct 7, 2011
  12. Too much abuse with Hansel's osfing
     
    #92 Hansel, Oct 8, 2011
  13. @hansel
    Apparently you like the company of "small boys and girls" according to iG…

    I find that a little disurbing.
     
    #93 PoseT, Oct 8, 2011
  14. Lol wtf?
     
    #94 Hansel, Oct 8, 2011
  15. Read iG's clan discription at the bottom…
     
    #95 PoseT, Oct 8, 2011
  16. No? Says hansel is a sexy beast?
     
    #96 Hansel, Oct 8, 2011
  17. I think this is a really good an well thought idea.

    @ Hansel try emailing the dev's with this idea and see if they respond to it with any thoughts / issues. This would really make the game more interesting.
     
    #97 Forum, Oct 14, 2011
  18. They implement this..

    I'll start playing again. Stripping will be fun again 
     
    #98 iGiggle, Oct 14, 2011
  19. Genius. 'nuff said
     
    #99 thepieman, Oct 14, 2011
  20. So you make 33% of what the have out?
     
    #100 DarkFalcon, Oct 14, 2011
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Page 5 of 6