Really we still have conspiracy nonsense. No normal high rise fire involved aluminium planes and aircraft fuel and a water sprinkler system burning before. See high school chemistry and look at what happens to the aluminium. Then watch the video of the burning tower. Molten aluminium can be seen dripping out of the building. That is what caused the collapse. The building core collapsed due to a chemical bomb. The bomb was the actual aircraft and the fire fighting system. Unfortunately it was a well planned attack. It was a terrorist conspiracy. Let the dead rest in peace and stop mocking how their lives were taken. To blame the government for murdering its own people is to dishonour the memory of all those who lost their lives.
This is also true. I left out a bunch of facts. Didn't wanna overload people - something I've learned to avoid here in kaw forums over the years
@Chaos- The real dishonour would be believing a lie, and not searching for the truth of their death. It's easy to say the enemy killed our people. It's not so easy to say our own government did. Be smart, not weak.
If you really wanna put blame on someone about it other then terrorist look at the building designer why did he puts most of the structural integrity in the elevator shaft and the outside walls of the building rather then spacing them out evenly like everyone else?
Yup. Plus I'm not saying it was the government. I think it was the work of private individuals with influence on the government.
The twin towers were supposedly built to withstand the impact of a jet of that size. No matter how good the design, it can't stand against well-placed thermite.
If it's a conspiracy as some people claim. Why then was exactly NOTHING been revealed by the mountainous documentation released by Edward Snowdon ? Not a single whisper of a hint of a vague suggestion. That hardly spared the blushes of the U.S. Government and if snowdon wanted to do irreparable damage to the intelligence networks and political infrastructure of the USA the revelations of some conspiracy related to 9/11 would do that far more effectively than the massively damaging data he did see released.
Septentrio - again, I'm not saying the government was knowingly involved. This operation didn't require the use of any government assets
At the time it was built it was to withstand a wreak with the largest jet ever made (in 1970) however jets such as passenger Carrie and Jets got much bigger after 1970 and apparently the fuel catching fire was never though of in the design.
I have watched many documentaries on the truth behind 9/11 with all the different theories. And, they all seemed very convincing to me. I have also similarly been convinced after watching 'conspiracy' theories on the moon landing or the JFK assassination. One thing is for sure, if the truth was any different from what the accepted norm is- the cover up for all these is airtight and no one will know FOREVER. Many innocent lives were lost. People don't remember what they did on their birthdays 15 or so years ago but, everyone remembers what they were doing when 9/11 happened. The cascade of events as a result of that day itself has been manifold. As for now, there can't be another truthto this simply because the ramifications are gonna be even more profound.
3 planes 2 planes hit within a 30 minute range 1 plane hit the second tower 40 minutes of the first 2
How much bigger was the plane that hit compared to what the towers were designed to withstand? What's the difference in jet fuel then and now?
Ok as a firefighter we study this it is simple enough. It is called "impact load" the planes fuel heat the steal beams to failure causing the upper floors to come slamming down onto the lower floors. That is why the planes hit where they did. This act changed the world, so we all need to learn from it. Thanks.