50 vs 50 , perhaps too much?

Discussion in 'Wars' started by PandaGeorge, Nov 17, 2013.

  1. What's that you say? Chaos wars? Hmmm ;)
     
  2. It was 50 vs 50 when ee first started. Wasn't too much for those who thirst for war.
     
  3. Anything larger than 50 would be laggy, which was the biggest issue at the intro of ee trials
     
  4. I wonder if gonna be 1v1 wars
     
  5. It's called Chaos for a reason
     
  6. I can't see a fun war having more than 30v30
     
  7. Of course there will be a low matchup ratio.

    I think the devs are mainly trying to find out what times are the best for wars.
    If 50 people in many different clans can easily make the matchup, it's a good war time.
     
  8. Though personally, the 10 person wars kicked ass.
     
  9. No. Not a low matchup thing. There will be less matchups because less clans, With more poeple the odds the hit ratio and mean stats will even out. It should be good for matchups
     
  10. Personally I love there's wars there much more fun :p
     
  11. 100v100 ftw!
     
  12. Why complain... It's called Chaos wars for a reason.
     
  13. it is called chaos wars for a reason ;)
     
  14. 10v10 is awesome
    50v50 is awesome
    100v100 was awesome way back when.
    We should just appreciate that they're trying new things and expanding ee.
     
  15. Not gonna lie, 50vs50 is awesome!
     
  16. I like the 10vs10 it's easy and funner or 15-15 would be cool to anything over tht just to much
     
  17. The 50-50 wars a good just need us to get behind it more people better match ups
     
  18. Our last war was defo chaos 
     
  19. The name says it all it's chaos just because your pissed of a no match doesn't mean others are. Devs said it themselves trying out new things.
    They never said it would be permanent just a little change from the 26-29 roster. Get over it.
     
  20. The thumb roster is to long