Separate names with a comma.
Actually, had you even bothered to read the thread, you'd see that Don posted data that said volcanoes produce more carbon than human activities...
Um, "We" in this case would be humanity. The same "we" you referred to when you said "we don't have a realistic solution for". Or were you...
It's your position. You post it.
We have a realistic solution. It's the same one we used for Acid Rain and the depletion of the Ozone layer. Lower the flipping emissions. And the...
Since I have seem to have an audience, here's the thing that always puzzles me about rabid climate change deniers. What's wrong with taking out...
Don't be stupider than you have to be. I don't have to be a scientist to listen to the opinions of scientists anymore than I have to a doctor to...
You do the research. I've posted data backed by sources. You've posted nothing but opinion. Opinions are like sphincters. Everyone has one.
I'm not sure what country you're in, but in America the State doesn't own all the energy companies. And while the State creates the roads, the...
Are you going to post data to refute it or are you going to keep arguing your position without backing it up with any facts at all?
Actually, self righteous is blathering smugly to someone about using the Guardian as a source while ignoring the fact that the source for the...
Um, no. The answer is science isn't magic and the best solution to a problem caused by pumping tons of a type of gas into the atmosphere is to...
Um, no. The biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions is burning fossil fuels for electricity, heat, and transportation. That's not the "State"....
Actually, the source on page 2 is the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The source that the Guardian refers to, which is on page 6,...
Read the thread. The source was posted earlier on page 2.
You should have paid closer attention. Global cooling was never widely accepted by the scientific community. In fact, a survey of the literature...
Not in this case. 97% of the world's climatologists say it's happening and humans are contributing to it.
It's the common sense model of risk assessment based on the results of continuous peer reviewed investigations and observed data. Science is based...
@ Wordwaster I'm old enough to remember the acid rain and the ozone controversies. Science was right in both cases and the skeptics were wrong....
If your case is based on Pilmer and volcanos, you don't have a case. "How climate change sceptic Ian Plimer dodges valid criticism On page 413...
He's wrong. "Do the Earth’s volcanoes emit more CO2 than human activities? Research findings indicate that the answer to this frequently asked...