Separate names with a comma.
No no no no no lol that's not what i meant, re-read my post. I said if you don't have a war build don't ATTACK the idea without a suggestion that...
Steroids?
It's not favoring their build, it's making the system more fair, rather than all clans stacking lb and gh :roll:
If you post on here without a war build, and you attack the idea without suggesting ways to make it better...just leave...
Yeah I'd say get big enough to do nml and grab some moths for the prizes. And larry....you got a point lol.
That made no sense lol
What if there is a tie o.o lol
At least I'm funny as hell...lol
What about me :( lol
Somebody should re-do this thread and make it sexy and put it in the idea's section, leave this one here for discussions.
It shouldn't be, since when is war in real life profitable? It is by far the opposite. And an account with stats like: 400/200/150/150. Could grow...
Lol king that'd be fantastic...on second thought let's do st4t's idea :lol:
Actually i say it promotes huge lb type builds. That way they can try to pull more fails. Nobody wants less capable builds who pull no attack...
Yeah but he said everyone make the same amount per attack, like i said it kills strategy.
St4t, i like your ideas but that kinda kills some of the strategy in wars.
It's tweakable for sure, but it'd defidently let builds like mine be able to war again. Also i think mith should then be taken from a direct % of...
That's always a possibility as well, either way would give essentially the same results, but what about ko's? Would they give like 5 points? Or...
Well obviously the point count for fails would be lower, such as 1/2 the points for successful actions. Because turtling is a strategy and without...
Decent idea but you also need to get points for those who've failed actions on you. That way some of the previous ee war strategy can still work.
I love reading these i always get a good laugh :lol: thanks for sharing op but watch out for ZAFT now lmao