Separate names with a comma.
So that tiny change from getting back 70% to now 60% results in the donor paying more than 30 TIMES the tax they did previously. That's why many...
As a frame of reference, when you received 70% of value when you dropped an ally, your loss ratio was nearly zero. You would only lose a few...
Loss ratio is approximately 35%. This means your volley partner gets 65%, and 35% is lost to tax. Therefore, if you want your buddy to receive...
Ah, so it's tooshe? Touché. :)
It sounds like you've already made up your mind. Why are you asking us, then?
FYI the phrase "make money fast" pisses people off. Try not to ever use it. It makes ppl not want to help you.
If you are on the winning side of the war and you do not make a single attack or steal, you will get $1m. No more, no less.
OP is spammer.
Spamalious :)
Remember that unlike t3/t2, this time the lvl1 t4 is stronger than the lvl3 t3.
That's not what dillybar said. Plunder will rise if you replace a t3L3 with a t4L1. My plunder dropped when I upgraded it to L2. So personally...
So your goal is just to piss people off then? Sounds like you haven't been muted as frequently as you should be.
Typo in that first response: should be 100m / 0.65 = 153.85m. 0.65 comes from (1-0.35).
Essentially, this means you'll always need at least 1.5385x the cash you want the other person to actually receive. Thus you see the burden is...
That second example isn't correct. If your total loss was 100m, 35m would be lost permanently and 65m would be transferred to the other party....
I've run numbers in a spreadsheet, (I'm an actual mathematician) and determined the expense ratio levels off at approximately 34.38%. What this...
This guide sucks, just FYI.
Sadly, now taking a 30% loss is the most efficient way to transfer money. :(
This thread makes me seriously consider anger management therapy. Not only is this an utterly terrible guide, but all the spelling and grammar...
The giver would always lose money. Now he just loses about 30x more.