Separate names with a comma.
You're on to something there One. How about a clan bonus for the unferdog clan?
Res_One raises a valid point. I am also concerned by this issue. Hope the devs take a look at this.
I agree with LittleSnoreyDragon it would prevent clans from stacking. In a situation such as Dragon pointed out removing the number 1 seed would...
King that would be up to your clan's logistics. Perhaps first come first serve?
37 or 38 towers I think. But it doesn't work on ee.
Anything that's percentage based is dependent on troop and spy levels if I'm not mistaken. At least that's what I understand from Wulf's previous...
Lay off him. It's actually a very respectful post. Don't you guys have your own battles to fight? Nice thread War Zone.
Keep it classy guys. Don't fight forum battles.
Smaller players can do EEs too. Or they can EB if they dont wanna war.
No choice in the last one Princess. They were no.1 we were no.2, didn't matter if they were a 100x times stronger than us that was the fairest it...
Male when you take away 1/3 there's 2/3 left...
MWAR is an exploit
We were ranked 1 and RCA was 2nd. We outnumbered them by 20. Maybe RCA vs NWCB and WaRlor vs unbeknown would have been a better match.
Thor Sometimes a good leader would know when to back down for the sake of his charges. Yesterday I saw your number naked and about to quit kaw....
You had so many inactives...
No. Let mith be acquireable only through estoc wars. Once again I vote no on xtal usage increase.
Yeah but mwars aren't real wars. They're exploits same as pwars. If you don't like doing estoc wars there's always EB equips. Let mith wars die.
We're only voting on crystal usage for the clan with less participants not the issue on mithril wars. Mwars are already dead
Just to be clear. You've already killed Mith Wars right? And the vote is only about crystal usage am I correct? Well then I vote no to proposed...
Yes it was as fair as possible given that no 2 clans are equal.