Separate names with a comma.
@Moose: arkst feels pretty, but that's hardly relevant. Please stay on topic, or I'll ask you to leave the thread.
An attack build who can sit without gold out during an Estoc war with clan-wide bonuses on the line whilst making triple what is taken in the 1-2...
This isn't "butthurt". Pure spies can be pinned, hansels can be countered. An attack build allowed to hide behind dtw because of a mechanics flaw...
Difference for hansels: they can be pinned with far more ease, whilst not showing DTW and 0 spies.
That's the DEFINITION of an EXPLOIT!
CG says in HER OWN THREAD that she could fight from FULL TROOPS with spies dtw because of her build. HOW MUCH MORE OBVIOUS DOES IT GET?!?
@Anarchy: I respect your clan, I'll likely get my arse handed to me for this thread. I'm ok with that. I'm not sore over a loss. Lord knows I've...
It's an EXPLOIT, and should be treated the SAME as Polly and others (ie 24dude)
If I'm full troops and you're full troops, I should be able to hit you, not get DTW
Being able to be invulnerable to any action at full troops is an exploit. Bottom line.
Anyone could turtle like Polly did, moose, didn't stop Devs from cutting 100k wins away.
Fair is fair...apply punishment for exploits accordingly.
If that was cheating, how is this not?
PollyAnna was stripped of 100k wins with a build inside mechanics guidelines.
Reserved
I'm aware that I have already sent feedback on this subject, but here it goes... If Tower builds aren't an exploit of game mechanics, what is?...
Nope. Spies are already war kings. "VIP" will just render war leaders and trackers nearly unable to be tracked, as those folks would normally be...
I've been on either side of this coin. Should we be asked, we'll be there. Been hit for months on end by pro. Much respect to them. Neither...
We've already established that spragga wishes he was Sholron. What else is there for him to prove?