Separate names with a comma.
no.
no. ata only gives them to people that play kaw. i would give them to everybody, whether they play kaw or not. but i guess you don't want a...
or you could just vote for me. i'll save the economy by giving everyone in the country free xtals.
https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQUrEhqIlVag7lTJV-KI9Ra0VIraC5QvIvJnviBKMYTTvTe4zE7
i noticed that, too. lol
clinton has fought isis her "entire adult life"? isis hasn't even existed for MY entire adult life. where does this stuff come from?
Re: President Debate **Important** Yeah. 2. Maybe more. Maybe only 1. Cuz Ginsberg is a stubborn old lady. But even just one is an...
Re: President Debate **Important** Only one I know is going to leave is Ginsberg
Re: President Debate **Important** Who announced they were retiring?
Re: President Debate **Important** 2 Supreme Court judges. Maybe more. But at least 2.
That only lessens competition by shutting out players in different size ranges. (Not that I am against the idea, considering the huge size...
Making it more expensive? Right now it is almost impossible for people to hit large accounts that have no trouble hitting them. No one would...
Or how about just adding new attack pots and not defense pots. Gives smallers the option to hit biggers (at a cost) without putting any strain on...
But Pot burning larger builds would be a thing again, too. Right now the losses are so small that pot burning is a dead tactic.
It is sort of weird at this point. The power that pots provide is insignificant relative to the current build sizes, high end ebs (I can't clear...
i brought it up. and i mentioned that it was because the devs were greedy. it just them taking advantage of people with ocd that can't stand the...
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRmk5HBoGF1E6diNP6jKF8leG94QT0kwYs7Y_p22R32-rbPt_8P this is something of a holy text to me. i'm a big...
damnit. i hate that you are right. https://casetext.com/case/thompson-v-smith-24
omg why will no one just read the entirety of Thompson v.Smith 154 SE 579 ? it isn't even that long of decision (as far as supreme court...
going to repeat this; for the sake of thoroughness and because i have nothing to do atm: you are citing "definitions" that only apply to the...