Win/Lose Equipment in Battle

Discussion in 'Wars' started by *TB-CRYPT-TB (01), May 21, 2012.

  1. I think it would make KAW a little more interesting if you could win equipment from your opponent when you attack/steal from them, and you could lose it if they attacked/stole from you. There wouldn't need to be a very high chance of winning it for people to start hitting the battle list farming for items.
     
  2. No I like my equipment and maybe some person has tons of items but their build has terrible def so a noob comes along and attacks and gets a helmet no bad idea
     
  3. Not like o one hit and I get the sword..Needs a bit of improving. No support
     
  4. You'd be able protect your equipment by just not equipping it. Of course then it's not going to help you out either.
     
  5. (^)_(^)


    Cause one face palm just isn't enough
     
  6. 
    Noooooo don't do it!!!
    *bang* 
    U killed him with your failness!! Jk lol
     
  7. Maybe after you've stripped them of all their defense pots and allies thru equipment became up for grabs.
     
  8. I like the idea. Can see who's just chasing items here I guess.
     
  9. I disagree with the idea but like concept of encouraging bl hits so well done kid
     
  10. This would do just what we don't need... Discourage war
     
  11. Only a very small chanve if you win the attack or steal AND your opponent has no defense potions. Still bad idea.
     
  12. Actually theres another version you can do of this like this

    People can put their equipment up for sale at a certain price an a minimum price has to be 1bil and highest price is 300bil
     
  13. Golden.

    You are a typical EB noob, wouldn't dare think of touching the BL. Probably hardly ever hit anyone else.

    So this idea is a no from you, but a way to put equipment up for sale, which is easily exploitable is...

    Typical. :|
     
  14. Its come to this in KaW, all about their precious items and Epic Battles. What happened to the good old days of KaW that I experienced? Back then people wouldve agreed with this due to the survival of the fittest (Well in this case, Survival of the strongest and most active.)
     
  15. I think it's a great idea. Has been mentioned many times already though. I say we start by farming the noobs that disagree with this