I am trying to figure out can a hansel build make more money between spying and attacking then a maxed out pure attacker. the two sets of numbers i am looking for is a spy with 23 lvl 4 guilds and 1 lvl 3 sub vs. 24 lvl 3 subs next a spy with 23 t4L3 spy buildings vs an attacker with 24 t4L3 attacking buildings. any help on this would greatly be appreciated!!
Pure attackers. why? Troops earn static allies plunder. Hansel build with t3s gets 13m off osf, every hit. Pure spies make 10m off a pure attack on the first steal, and make 50k on the last steal. Also, pure spies can only hit farms. Pure spies don't make enough to bypass pots with their own pots.
But a spy build with one attacking building gets the allies plunder as well so theoretically they have two income. for example my current build is 17 level 3 guilds and 1 level 3 forge. If I have a constant target i can bring in 5.7 million per hit for a total of 23 hits so i can make 131,100,000 million every hour with armies then my spies can bring in another 1.8 million per steal. my question is if i switched all my buildings to attack building would my income be higher or by having this duel system am I achieving the maximum amount of income per hour.
Does anyone have any numbers on this? As for calling people noobs becasue they ask a question, well that's just pathetic. the reason for asking is that in the t3 category lvl 4 guilds had the highest allie plunder. so if you had a farm that you could use every hour and achieve max plunder then i thought you would be able to make more money then an attacker. I was seeing if anyone had evidence to the contrary.