Looking at the first set of matches after the final update there was only one no match. This would be wonderful new except out of the 25 matches that were created, only a half dozen we even at all interesting, and only 2 truly exciting. There has to be a better way to match clans. The record for this war is: 19 awful matches, 4 so-so matches, and 2 good matches ????? Clans are closer together in war strength than this; for some reason the wrong group of clans are being matched. Given that current matchup algorithm does not pair clans with anywhere close to an even chance of winning, why bother with it? If adding in BFE and adjusting for towers and guilds is too complicated, try something really simple.Matching clans randomly would do better than current system I imagine; I am sure matching clans with winning records vs clans with winning records would do much much better.
Omg . Matches are uneven!!!! I didnt get a match!!!! Not they're to boring!!!!!! Lol some noobs will never be satisfied.
What 20% clans had an exciting match? Maybe we can clone them and just let the 20% plus the clones fight each other. That might be exciting. Clone wars.... Get it?
I will report on the current matches too ... my guess is we see a similar outcome. Personally, I prefer a no match to a bad one, win or lose. I know plenty who have exploited the system to get mith disagree, but I dont find struggling with teammates to try get the hit on the opponent coming out of KO to be entertaining, nor do I find getting smacked immediately as I come out of KO to be fun. For those who want easy mith, just give them a mith EB and let them do it as many times as they want. For those who want close wars, please do SOMETHING different so we dont have 80% boring wars. Honestly, try winners vs winners - I am sure you will get far more interesting matches.
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is one of those noobs that just can't stop complaining about anything. Feast your eyes as the noob continues to complain all day and night.