I know it used to not be profitable to be. A pure spy but now with hauntings and other eb's if you just assassinate and hit items you can make a lot of money so why don't I see more pure spys
Hansels make more because they can also attack as well as all that pure spies do. Pure spies make less money now pwars are gone.
Well it's like this. A hansel can make a lot more, because they have all the ability to spy of a pure spy, but the power to hit of an attack build. It's a win win, as long as they have a high enough bfa.
Because if you are a Handel you make a ton more. With the plunder from attacks plus the added bonus, for losing just 1 guild or SOS or vol.
On the concept of spies, does 1 SOS give more steal gold than a guild? So would 35 guilds be better then 35 SOS considering the money gained from steals?
Steals, (I believe,) get higher by the amount of damage done to the thing you are stealing from. So yes, 1 SOS is better than 1 guild. If that is wrong please correct me!
I want guilds for good attack plunder but I want SOS for good steal plunder and strength WHY MUST IT BE SO HARD TO CHOOSE SUFEOGDKOBCDQRKBCDSVJVDHOV
A level 4 guild earns more plunder than a level 2 SOS I believe. Once that SOS gets to level 3, it's plunder is more than top level guild. Volaries at level 1 earn less plunder than a level 3 SOS I believe. But once again, once that volary gets to level 2, it earns more plunder than a SOS level 3.
I have tried being a hansel and i like being a pure spy because you get more payout at wnd of eb, dont have to worry about people buying well priced allies, and you dont need mithril to hit big ebs