Guild hansels.... SAY 100-200K ATTACK CAN ATTACK WITH SUCCESS VS A ATTACK BUILD WITH HIGHER BFE AND BFA with base defence of 5.8m HOW IS THIS FAIR... The attack build is land complete and base stats of over 18m and the gh account is less than 2m yet the GH can attack and win against 6m defence and the attack build fails attacks?? SS
Problem with GH: War equipment is really offensive based.. I mean, look at the freaking chest plate.. It has loads of attack! BFA is easy to get, because you aren't focused on growing. Attack builds need MORE STATIC ADT THEN SDT NOW. Plunder is key, getting KO'D isn't that bad when you aren't leaking a **** ton. Attacking always gives the offensive by 60m (which is like 1.1m attack CS, if I'm correct) so it's easily possible for people to ram through 5-6m CS builds.. Plus, you have to consider your variable stats: GH attack stats come from pots, mith, BFA and BFE. Attack builds get that too, but if you are at 20% troops a GH at 10% can still do amazing damage, about the same if he was at 100%. An attack build starts to loose that amazing attack bonus when they dump troops, thus why, Hansels are broken.
Am I the only one that noticed op said he had higher bfa/bfe than the guild hansel that was getting successful attacks on him??
@ peanutbutter ! If bfa is only 2% for you then consider Too raise your bfa a bit ! my bfa is around 30% and its static !
They won't address this, at least not while they're still making money on xtals, seals, horns and moth fairies. The seasonal wars have been screwy since they started so it's no surprise their gh "fix" didn't fix anything.
If att build is coming out of pin with little or no adt, and has % based equip on instead of static, it's easily possible. Hansel troop level is irrelevant
Gh doesn't need to xstal, they're attack strength is based on pots, bfe, bfe, mith etc, not buildings. They are just as likely to get through at 2% as at 100%