Estoc Trials - Week 6 - War #3 - General Update

Discussion in 'Past Events' started by admin, May 8, 2013.

  1. War #3

    Signups: 42
    No Match: 6

    Middle Earth - your clan size was too big. Given the history of wars for the last 6 weeks, no one signs up with a roster of this size. You were warned about it last week. If you continue to do this we will have to take action.

    Steel Raiders - lower your sign up size to get more potential matches.

    Mith Warriors - your build stats were too low for your next available match.

    Epic Academy - you had a low BFA and could only be matched with one other clan but were the odd man out.

    Amun Ra - odd man out situation, given your build stats your BFA was too low.

    Empire - given your build stats your BFA is a bit low, so increase it to get more potential matches.

    Clan Size breakdown

    [​IMG]

    X-Axis - Clan sizes
    Y-Axis - # of signups

    As per usual, we will be monitoring clan BFA numbers and we will address any suspicious activity throughout the coming war. Please keep BFA changes post-sign up to a reasonable minimum! Anything beyond that and you will be warned and risk losing rewards and/or match-ups!
     
  2. Uh better English please 
     
  3. I feel like he is trying to talk to me!!!

    "Amun Ra you odd man out situation, given your build stats your BFA to get more potential matches."

    What does it mean? '

    Its almost a triple rainbow.....what does it all mean
     
  4. Hi Kaw Admin. Thanks for the feedback. On behalf of Empire could I ask why our BFA has suddenly become too low? Have you changed parameters in anyway?

    It's just we have never had the no match situation before. We have been (rightly or wrongly) matched up numerous times to ER, La Resistance and the Warlor's of this world, and beat a branch of Zaft last week and BFA wasn't an issue then.

    Thanks
     
  5. I am not one to post in forums but I feel a need to as to get an answer of matchup "V-Hawks vs Naked and Famous KINGS". Clan strength of NaF is 37th and V-Hawks is 111th. Which leads me to wonder why if they have so many more player atop their roster in war and we don't then how it is even? Thought would be well our middle and small part of roster must be larger but to my astonishment No, our middle is even smaller then their middles that are warring, I'm not here to ask for any freebies of any sort just wish for some feedback and positive improvements, Thank You
     
  6. @kaw_admin

    why does the system allow us to sign up so many?
     
  7. @KaW_Admin I would appreciate if you could explain what the last war required to keep your rancor until rewards are distributed. An answer would be much appreciated

    -Slaughter
     
  8. @kaw_admin

    can you please lower the maximum limit to the number of people you actually want people to sign up with? this way my members know the decision is not as to why they cannot war.

    And ive taken SS of every roster, we were too small, and you suggested more people, then too big, then too small, now too big again. I cannot control people's work schedules or class schedules, they war when they can war. if you recap, you will see people have signed up with 40 people before, I've seen 37 multiple times. Instead of "taking action" on a clan that's trying to war, try "taking action" on the coding that will lower the maximum number of players that can sign up for wars if you want there to be less people.

    I've seen you comment on so many clans to reduce member size. now it's our turn I guess. who will it be next?

    why do you have a maximum limit of 40 if you don't want 40 people to sign up?

    In the beginning, we were fine with the 25-30 minimum. It was when you raised the minimum limit to 40 people was when our "clan unity" broke apart. we could never meet the 40 people and people got frustrated as I'm sure the many other clan have also. Many members went off to find clans that had merged to meet 40, those mixed clans.

    thanks for lowering it back down to 25 but now all my people are gone.

    you totally screwed us. Now we've been trying to get back into warring after the chaos you created for the Kaw-community and everyone's "clan unity" by trying to recruit and bring in more people to war again and we're the ones to get punished?

    why can't we match up with those clans I've seen sign up with 37-40 in the past? Oh that's right, you keep telling everyone not to sign up with that number of people.

    I guess we shouldn't even try then. thanks! you now broke up my clan again for the second time. people will go off and look for other clans.

    less members for us to complete hauntings. and maybe I should thank you? becuase everytime we have to hit that paladin eb, we're all wasting 6 Xtals each person to complete.

    when you started EWars, you said it was for everyone. how is it for everyone when the small clans have to use Xtals to complete paladins? or if that.. even finish? small clans like ours can't complete paladins. in addition to having zero troops after a war, and not being able to be at full troops for the paladin eb after the war. forcing us to use even more xtals to complete to get a small amount of Mith.

    The problem is not us. It's your system allowing so many members to sign up.

    Solution? Reduce maximum number of people to sign up. problem solved. How hard is that? Just change the 2 number is your code from 40 to the number you want. I'm sure it will take no more than 30 seconds.

    Your Turn to respond.
     
  9. support for king_me.


    "taking action" for having a war roster that is within the member limit that YOU set? get your act together instead of threatening clans that haven't done anything wrong.
     
  10. Agreed with King- it's not our fault that there aren't other similar size clans around. We want to have a fair war, perhaps by adjusting the clan sizes that can join we may have a chance? The paladin eb costs a fortune of crystals to complete, so you make money out of us either way.
     
  11. @kaw_admin

    if you want more clans to war, making the paladin eb easier would be a plus because I've seen many smaller clans attempt to war, but because they cannot complete the paladins eb due to their size, they give up and quit warring altogether. I'm sure they think it's it's a waste of time not being to get anything out of their 6 hours.
     
  12. Support for King_ME who is trying his very best to work around the new rules the devs keep setting with the changing goalposts. If you don't want 40 to war, reduce the max size. And don't threaten action against someone who is acting within the system and trying to keep his clan united. That's just wrong. Thank you.
     
  13. Thanks admin for explanation.
    Also curious on sudden change though.
    Re guild hansel exploit floating around and all the ideas on how to solve the exploit.
    For the purpose of ee wars only would it not be possible to have builds pay a minimum of 1 mil per land
    The majority of builds pay more than that and it would kill the exploit guild hansel overnight whilst leaving it as a means of entry to war to new players.
    Fair payout for every build would make wars closer and more fun IMO.
    I'm sure this idea will be objected to but there it is.
    [​IMG]
    Ps if your going to allow big ally's to reset pay the owner more so they can replace lost BFA might of helped our match up a bit today
     
  14. @devs please explain the V-hawks matchup. Our clan rank 111 - we had 4 of our top 20 in the match. Kings Naked and Famous - rank 37. They had 10 of their top 20 in match. I been in a lot of wars and this ranks up as one of the all time worst i have been in.

    Please Explain.
     
  15. Lol asking for admin to explain. They may next week when they can be bothered. They kinda forget we pay them to work.
     
  16. @admins @ devs @anyone - please explain

    ok just did the math of the combined stats for our war

    V-hawks combined stats - 202,779,582
    Naked and Famous Kings - 260,448,318

    57,668,736 difference!! BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    Based on looking at allies - Our BFA was a lot lower too.

    Please explain this?
     
  17. Hi ScacFu, I would like to point out, NaF Kings did not have 10 ppl in top 20, And, you had many guild hansels and one more person. And you had a good number of ppl with good bfa.
     
  18. @awesome i think he meant 10 people out of top 20 of clan roster...
    i was in the war... we got good people with high bfa, but they werent in the war... im sure NAFK also had the bfa advantage... and great war btw, thanks for handling our asses back to us in that one >_<


    @Scac im pretty sure devs dont care...
    you can even say bypasses in this thread and they wont be able to read about it LOL...
    Theyre too busy counting the money they got, or stole from us players and theyre currently laughing their way to the bank :lol:
    I just hope the disadvantage goes around... weve been at a disadvantage for 3 straight wars, about time that the messed up war system turns it in our favor...

    must... win... coin... toss...