You already know what this thread is about just by reading the title. If you don't, allow me to explain. Undisputed facts: 2 planes struck the twin towers Both towers collapsed Lots of innocent people died Disputed facts: The cause of the collapse of building 7 The magic disappearance of Flight 93 The "official" explanation of the building 7 collapse is that fire from the twin towers penetrated the building, causing it to burn to the ground. It collapsed into its own footprint, just like the twin towers in what very closely resembled a controlled demolition. What the official story leaves out is the fact that no high-rise building fire has ever caused it to collapse into its own footprint. Supporters of the official story say the twin towers collapsed into their own footprint because the impact of the planes buckled the support beams and caused the upper floor to "pancake" onto the floor beneath it, initiating a chain reaction that continued till it hit the ground. Building 7 also fell into its own footprint, but no plane ever struck it. How do they explain the way it collapsed? They can't. They say the heat from the fire caused it. 3 high-rise footprint collapsed in less than a day, when no other high-rise fire had ever caused such a collapse. Maybe it was a miracle. The "official" story of Flight 93 was supposedly brought down by brave passengers who forced the plane down. Question: if these "brave passengers" we're able to bring the plane down, why didn't they just beat up the "terrorists" who hijacked it in the first place instead of killing themselves and everyone else on board? Another question: what happened to the plane wreckage? They say if vaporized upon impact. The blades in the engine were made of titanium. Nothing on that plane could burn hot enough to vaporize titanium. Everyone already has made up their mind and no one is going to be convinced by this thread, but if we are going to have remembrance threads, then we need to have threads that challenge the facts and make us take a look at what is physically possible versus what the "official story" is.
So when will you post a what really happened in Benghazi on the other 9/11, or is it because it happened under Obama, and Hillary , you don't care?
For example, why did Obama order troops ready to deploy to stand down, or why the cover up and say that it was nothing more than a protest turned violent over a utube video, last I chked protesters don't bring aka's and rpg's to a protest then there was the ever famous Hillary quote when asked about it " at this point what difference does it make" unquote, in other words refusing to answer for her involve not in it
Interesting questions. I don't know enough about it, so I can't comment. But it also happened on 9/11? Just different year?
I for one am a firm believer that we are being lied too on the matter. When the media says one thing, but evidence says another...
Any current/recent high school students know if the destruction of the twin towers is covered in history books? If so, what does it say about what happened?
My textbook said it was an attack by Fidel Castro, in retaliation for the assassination of his lover, John F. Kennedy, by the United States government.
Just a reminder to keep things appropriate and respectful when it comes to the sensitive topic at hand.