A fix for those bored Top100-200

Discussion in 'Ideas + Feature Requests' started by IDS_zachmighty_IDS, Jan 10, 2017.

  1. Every time new tiers are released the Top 100-200 (and more) get the new tiers upgraded extremely quickly (last Tiers there were some that were BC the day it was released, or BC with in a couple days). It takes a year for new lands, meanwhile these top players after they BC they're just stocking up on allies. Take for example the player K2 has the 1st and 3rd most valuable allies, they total to about 2.8 Quadrillion (2800 Trillion). This shows that many have too much gold they don't know what to do with except for just spend a lot of gold on allies (or ally) just because they have too much money they don't know what to do. Why not release 2 or more new lands/tiers at the same time. This would give them something to actually do in the mean time. Because one tier/yr isn't working because the top 100 (top 10 specifically tbh) have Quadrillions in allies, they drop some of those allies when new tiers are released, then are BC, so releasing more than 1 tier/lands per year would be beneficial to many, and it would allow them something to spend their gold on rather than allies.
     
  2. So then it's impossible to bc without spending same as lb? Lel terrible idea.

    Edited for spelling.
     
  3. The lb accounts will still bc and then make even more gold, need a chance for strips to remove gold from market first. No support, inflation is already bad
     
  4. Terrible idea the gap between P2P and F2P will become to big not like it isnt already but as soon as devs realease those lands next 2 days they are already BC again making even more money aswell are now normal people will NEVER catch up
     
  5. Lol its already impossible to BC without spending. I've spent a considerable amount of money(~£350), and this build is still only 1.2/2.6Q to being BC
     
  6. The devs need to stop handing out 4T to everyone every two weeks. That might curb the inflation in the ally market.
     
  7. Would be easier without bots tho wouldnt it
     
  8. Well I mean that's not a lot.. I mean if you don't make much could seem like a lot but that's not too bad. Who knows how much I've spent over my kawreer, but now I only stick to spending on promotions.
     
  9. From 100.000 spermatozoids you was the smartest one?
     
  10. This is the exact opposite of everything everyone everywhere is fighting for. I'm not even sure most of the LB would want this to happen.

    Is there something below no support?
     
  11. You can't create a sink for LBs. Warring and stripping is the closest you can get for a true sink. Otherwise you're just punishing the majority of the player base.
     
  12. If they can afford to be top 200 I'm pretty sure they can afford sinks in their houses
     
  13. Okay but can they pay for the water bill?!
     
  14. Very true that water bill just trickles down causing the average player to quit. Trickle Down the Drain economics
     
  15. First of all, realise that you are talking about spending 100's of pounds on a TAP-TAP phone game...
    Secondly, one of the replies was insinuating that if OP's suggestion was implemented it would mean if you want to be BC, you must spend. I was simply highlighting that this is already the case.
    Last of all, post with your main if you are going to brag :/
     
  16. Also, I just counted,
    Turns out Ive spent £649 on here since March, brilliant...
     
  17. I've spent about $100 (94.44 or 94,44£ (how ever y'all do decimals and thousands places)
     
  18. I am not lying when I say I plan on not spending till next Black Friday. Depending upon how much the game has deteriorated from now until then