Oh no, those poor deprived millionaires? Argument is truly flawed. And these damm disabled scum living off the system!
I dont care what time of working hard. But if you work for your money and obtain by legal means then you earned it and can keep it and shouldnt have to give it to non workers. 2. Good for them. Just because you dont have money doesnt mean you cant make it. Work save be smart and anyone can have money. 3. Thats an exception. Im not talking about people who cant physically or mentally work. Thats good that the govt uses tax money to help them. Im talking about who choose not to work. People who choose to take advantage of govt programs and if sanders has way to give more money to poor people that will take away a bunch of incentive for people to work. Yes help those who cant. But too many people will take advantage of it. And its not hard to find some type of job. But most people dont want to look.
What is considered "legal" today when it comes to exploitation of workers is disgusting and should be changed
The number of super rich people in the U.S. Is very very few. Fortunately, they have figured out a way to make poor idiots argue for them for their short term personal gains.
1) My argument is alpha's are at the top for a reason, there is nothing flawed about it. 2) Not what I was going for there, rather the lazy worthless dogs who don't work or can't keep a job, don't try to get jobs or education to get ahead, and then complain about how the rich have it so easy and are robbing the "poor." Poor is a mindset, not the $ amount in the bank account.
He said "democracy" not a "representative democracy" his lack of education in that field is stated just by that sentence. A "democracy" and a "representative democracy" are not the same thing
When you punish people for being richer, working harder, and making more money than others, several things will happen. A. The rich will go elsewhere. B. Without having to work hard to make their money, people will refuse to work, much like the current welfare system but worse. And C. There will be even less incentive to start a business. Less reason to work. Fewer and fewer entrepreneurs. You want the economy to tank even more so than it already is? Do all of those things.
Zeth it's not about punishing rich people it's about fairness. Why should someone earning just above the poverty line pay more of a percentage of their income in taxes than some one who earns millions. Let's not forget corporate taxes also it's hard for a small businessmen already but when corporate earnings are hidden and untaxed that just makes it harder.
This talk about a fair wage for workers disincentiving people from working is a pure fantasy cooked up by the super rich who wish to keep their exorbitant bonuses at the expense of disadvantaged people trying to earn a living. It's a false argument. If people have a living wage, they have incentives to work. Conversely, If wages are so low that they can't make ends meet, that is when they have no incentive to work. In fact they have a higher incentive to turn to crime just to take care of basics like eating. Simply because some people need welfare to survive does not mean that everyone would prefer it to working and earning money.unless there are no opportunities or the pay they would get is so low that there isn't any point.
The media play on this. The actual percent of people who do this is extremely low. 99% of the time people want a job and want to feel they are adding to society.
If sanders can't defend his microphone how can he defend America? If hillary can't satisfy her husband how can she satisfy America? If jeb isn't a tough guy how can he make America tough again? Trump gets my vote. (mostly cause he's not too fond of political correctness, which i think is degenerate. Like Marxist logic.)