Remember guys people act like there grow but cry over a name it's a game for crying out loud if you don't like the name grow your stats plan and simple to many cry babies
It won't matter if the name is soldier, peasant or dirtbag... Everyone will know, deep down , that that role is peasant. Peasant
I voted clansman. Though I don't particularly care either way. The OP smacks of butthurt. "Whiny Forum Noobs"? You're the one who felt the need to make a thread because you were upset over the voting. I would point to the pot and kettle metaphor. Either way the outcome, I don't care. It's only the people who are peasants in clans that are actually mad about it, and it's only the admins that are mad about those who think their title should be different. But please, before you call everybody whiny, check yourself. You've got that part covered.
op is less whiny and butthurt and more so snarky and likes to stir the pot. He did it for reactions and differing opinions. He stirred the pot, you fell in. Bet you feel silly.
I thought the op pulled back quite a bit The fact ANYONE had a negative reaction to a role named peasant is ridiculous. In a tier system, there NEEDS to be a bottom, there NEEDS to be an undesirable position, or else you create a society of loafers and underachievers. To many people ( in KaW and RL) already have the 'Guild Hansel' mentality, now they want a pretty name to go with it?
I actually agree with you OP. Its a sad world when you dont get your way and have to run along and tell mommy. If you dont like it... please just complain about it until it's changed! What kinda lesson is that for our youth?? Dont change it Devs. #peasant4lyfe #crawloutyallsfeelings
So.... Would farmer do it? Or is this not about having a title reflecting the military class? Cause - i'm telling you - if you hit Apherium all day you have not warred. So perhaps warden it should be ort yeoman.