Game of War has something like this. The "king" gets to give people titles that reduce buffs and whatnot. Some of the titles are funny, like "dog" "fool." But if you think KaW is a cash grab, you might have a heart attack if you ever played Game of War. That game is basically impossible to be competitive in unless you're dropping serious cash into it. Be grateful our devs haven't done that to KaW.
Somehow missing a jester or buffoon role... Never liked the peasant term (well, not that I would mind calling my future subjects like that). And really don't like the limited number as well as paying for unlocking roles at all. And I certainly was one of those asking for more clan roles back then when Moose still made forum threads...
Why is kinsman not an option? And don't be whiny! It'll be awesome calling people peasants you peasants!!
Well, knights can't mute, can't kick peasants so why call them peasants then. Would you do epic battles with peasants? While a captain can mute or kick a soldier. Peasant uprising is uncool. Soldiers? Becoming rebels or mercenaries or undercover agents.. great..
Were peasants full-time armed combatants? I don't find it fitting because it's not descriptive of the role, not because it's "mean" to call people peasants.
Hey @KaW Devs, are you considering adding new Warchief slots? Might be helpful, cause that's basically the 'council's now
Perhaps soldier should also be a rank given which is normal clan member and peasants are for new players and visiting players given to them by war chief or perhaps if someone does something silly in cc and war commander doesn't like it gives them peasant role and changes there name colour for like 2 hrs