Hi KaWmunity, oberserving and expering a very unsatisfactory S5 with no (major) improvements, i’ll like to suggest on thing regarding the roster. Maybe it is already discussed and I haven’t seen it. Why are such rosters fixed by number of players? Devs have shown that their system can handle big rosters and small rosters (just technically). Literally the current match ups a little flexible but mostly 25 people. This leads to a huge bandwith mainly in the top tier rosters. And in case not many signing up the top roster reaches from 160m stats down to 90m stats (would be even more considering the bfa from top lbs). I’d like to suggest a flexible number of people designated to each indi roster. That means devs should limit the roster not by the top 50 biggest who signed up each indi and then distribute them into 2 rosters. The system should floor at a certain bandwith e.g. 25% from the biggest who signed up (if the war is bfe, bfa then that should be included). All within this bandwith should be distributed over the top tier rosters. The following biggest signee is reference for the next bandwith and so on. In order to have not such huge rosters going down the stats devs could include the suggested bandwith and a cap in terms of numbers e.g. 50 people max for one tier (means 2 rosters). So in the top tier I would expect less people per roster in the mid and in lower tiers nothing should change. At least devs should give it a try and see how it ends up. The current idea to reward action, ko’s and plunder is one I like but how fair is it really? In the current set up if someone is taking a lot and succeeds the player don’t get an action. It’s only showing the offensive actions. What about to add the successful defense actions? Comments, remarks and improvements/alternatives are welcome.
You can't complain. Tanks and sh are losing gold on eb's and leaky builds like you are winning because of them. They lose out on something to win another.
Yeah I get it, but most tanks are already getting 6 planar medals per indi, do they really need a 7th?
Not all tanks gain 6. I've only gotten 1 triple crown. Not many with 6. Most tanks get most actions due to eaten fails. I believe tanks deserve what they get. Dunno why your hating on them. If they get 7 that means you won. If your side has no tanks you have a much higher chance of losing. I don't care if it's 6 or 7. S5 was a bad season anyways.
Tanks are important yes, but they're dominating s5 lb. Anyways, I always get match up against top100 s5 tanks