Indeed. Could you please elaborate? Perhaps offer some evidence for your conclusion? I'm just curious.... Thanks!
No support on EE not being demoted. If someone get EE 5 or as in you say EE10, he will always be there, no matter a loss.
Hey Vik, I'm not sure that I understand your comment. This thread, as I see it, isn't so much about those with max EE as it is about encouraging folks to work for their EE at all levels. And not discouraging people from joining wars because of the reward system that discourages people from working for the top level EE because of the risk of losing current EB with a loss (and loss exceeds the potential gain).
No support max EE shouldn't be easy to get - losing wars needs to be penalised therefore losing 1 level of EE is perfectly acceptable. Noobs need to stop expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. ️
No support. EE 5 with the max of 50% is fine. The only issue is with the timer which is currently at 14 days. This is too long and should be shortened to 5 days. Other than that, losing a war should decrease your EE level as it makes it less easy to reach EE 5. The only improvement they can implement is to increase the max EE level from 5-10 with the maximum new plunder increase at 100% - but the timer for anything exceeding lvl 5 should be shortened to 3 days.
Support i like it! Although if you once have lvl 10 its to easy stay ten. I like too see from 5-10 ee lvl that can loose ee if lose a war . This benefit your proposal and will make still challenge. To stay top ee
Dumb ideas go into the trash. Now why would more eb builds war if EE 1 is 5% n not 25%? Why even bother with towers at all then? How about leave war ideas to those who war plenty n the war vets who have real ideas for the real problems