il be honest, i think their should be a price cut on all towers except for the arbs in hl. The price for towers is the same as any building but they have more drawbacks such as half the stats and a substantial decrease in plunder. although they are still a greeat asset and im definitely going to put them up soon. ofcourse if there is a price cut every towered player should get refunded
I did not realise it reduced plunder? I just assumed it offered very little or no plunder. Is this true?
A few points: 1. Towers do not reduce plunder in general. They reduce ally bonus and can reduce plunder slightly due to the change in size difference between the attacker and attackee. 2. I do not believe ee makes up for the plunder loss on ebs, at least not for tank builds who may need 1/3 of their cs devoted to towers. Ps with a few m in sdt will surely make more with ee, however. 3. War participation is horrid, and devs don't seem to be doing much to encourage participation. Round wars continue to be dominated by lb and sh, primals are all but restricted to hansels now, and Indy does not provide the full clan war experience. While it's fair to say one should be willing to sacrifice something to be able to war, there does need to be a balance. If I want to war, have a war build but can't war because I'm a tank, I'm discouraged from keeping my war build due to the plunder loss. 4. DEVS ARE VERY RETICENT to change core mechs. This isn't some tiny fix, but requires an overhaul of the core structure of the game, and can lead to a huge number of new exploits and unintended consequences. Don't get ur hopes up.
Listen up, noobs. Towers lower your plunder because it raises your overall stats, while not producing anymore plunder. Example: No towers 5m attack 5m defense 1m spy attack 1m spy defense Vs. 0 attack 0 defense 6m spy attack 6m spy defense Basically, 12mcs vs 12mcs You will make a set amount of gold, according to your attack and spy attack buildings, and also your size compared to opposing kingdom. With Towers 5m attack 7m defense 1m spy attack 4m spy defense vs. 0 attack 0 defense 6m spy attack 6m spy defense Basically 17mcs vs. 12mcs. You will make less because you are hitting a smaller opponent. Only fair.
If you even understand what you're talking about string cheese you would know that a 12 mil attack build is = 8-9mil ps build. Work it out with total number of buildings not stats
Obviously I understand Spy Builds are weighted more heavily. This was just an example to teach newer players how towers and plunder work. No need to read anymore into it
Times spy attack by approx 140% to get a relatively equal strength to attack. As for towers it allows a build such as mine to war more effectively n win EE bonuses which offset eb plunder drop. Pointless to expect any change unless wanting KaW to become totally EB only. Boring
He so far contributed more to this thread than you. Just sayin As for the thread itsself, making the plunder reduce by towers lower encourages people to build towers more yes. So a lot of people, nearly everyone will build towers because of such a change. Kaw will be all about talking trash and then hiding behind the millions of towers they built, no one will be able to hit anyone
Im not really looking to contribute anything to this thread. but if I can get that chump to slow his roll a little bit, it would greatly benefit forums as a whole
Take ur statless mental midget alt elsewhere. Go seek validation from someone who cares. Chump build = cowards n pyjamas
Nighthawk nobody is buying it that you are some kind of gangsta. all those pictures you post on 3rd party apps of you flexin your little bird chest and holding up dollar bills doesn't impress me. you are a fake ass tough guy
Whilst it does suck. I think the benefit of being able to defend very successfully far outweighs the problem of lessened plunder
Never claimed to be a Gangsta. I leave that to the punks of the world stuck in cyberworlds. I play this game n let others imaginations run wild. Take ur insecure crap to where u kiddies get off on it. My last post regarding ur garbage.