Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 Ah the estoc war things yeh nvm ignore me you get attacked in these wars right
Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 Yes but surprisingly you can't be attacked by your own members.
Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 I practically have same gear as u... So that argument is invalid. Ur looking for an easy way to bank so u don't get plundered in EE, ur one of the reasons EE is broken. Always wanting something to make it easier for u to war. Get off ur ee high horse bro, and learn to deal with it.
Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 It's too insignificant imo. Both sides can do it, it's only one hit, and when you're banking gold by the time you get down that low that little bit of gold left would've probably been taken already.
Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 I think your last two threads have been off a bit and a better argument can be made than the one you so eloquently stated. #1 I agree that the disparity between a Hansel top steal and an attack build of comparable size needs to be examined closer. For example my top hit as a build complete attack build is usually 90 mil plus or minus 3 mil depending on size of the build, im hitting which is 99% of the time another attack build. I'm not sure what a build complete hansel gets top steal but I'm sure it's over 100 mil easy. Actually I'm not sure at all because I am not a hansel if someone wants to tell me then I can validate my first point. Point #2 the bigger issue imo is the fact that you can be stolen from every time you attack from a hansel but if said hansel is zero troops, as an attack build you can't attack back. Now let's examine this closely. So as an attack build in primal you are Dtw to steals as long as you have no gold out which is the only way you are dtw. As a hansel you are Dtw to attack if you have no gold out and if you have no troops which is 2 ways instead of one. No other build has this advantage. Hybrids have it worse as they have to be zero gold and zero spy to be Dtw to steals. So a better argument can be made to change the payout discrepancy and the mechanics than can be made for the one pot thing. I hope I articulated my point. So imo Hansels have a distinct and clear advantage the current EE format which is an advantage of thier build type. I could be wrong on this but it's just a better argument imo.
Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 No support, buy pots and have someone hit you to clear you before the war
Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 I sit down in a quiet room and use my thumbs
Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 As long as it takes to prove my argument
Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 I have to say, this has gotten hilarious. Being it's been a long time since I've participated in ee I can't give a qualified opinion but I can say, I atleast understand what you are trying to address. Asking to be cleared pre war is such a 'lol' answer. Seriously, lol.
Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 Funny thing is how many people actually war primals consistently not many just trolls
Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 I haff to ad my too scents now I have seen spil cloud agreement witch is amazing and I saw prince akuma use more punctuation all though he needs to use the return butoon to create readable paragraphs. I think on the hole it was somewhat sensible there are professional violinists helping out with war mechanics improperly citing war mechanic threads but the best is the continuous advice by those that have no clue. The biggest problem is with the OP though . When you make a suggestion to improve the game it needs two impotent factors #1: the Devs need to be able to sell more xtals / seals nobs in order for it to be a viable upgrade in the future and #B in order to get support from the kawmunity you need the players that drop RLBucks to be able to personally get more from the game that they previously were getting. Actual war improvements are so 2012 so op. Get real bro. Darn I ran out of things to say I don't know how to close this out oh maybe I can say it has been a pretty funny read but I'm easily entertained
Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 Prince I don't believe atk builds can hit hansels if they have 0 gold and full troops.
Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 @suspect Dude you couldn't be more wrong , I have absolutely no problem at all losing a close war to a decent opponent I don't care if I lost 10 straight I would say damn well at least they were good wars now I need to change to make my team better You probably would've posted that same response had I been complaining about sh stacked rosters two seasons ago My only goal is to shed light on imbalances in the game . And people will say oh life isn't fair , guess what? This isn't life it's a damn phone app that should be bound to rules. and when I'm taking 3 hours out of my day to set up a war and then spending money on the war I feel I should have a goddamn shot to win the war 80% of the time But how often do we get matched and say "oh this is a win" or "we are screwed"? Every time ? It doesn't have to be this way and when I see problems in war linger for months on end I just don't get the inaction on devs part It is my favorite part of the game and I really just want it to be fun for everyone , idont like smashing a smaller roster and I don't like getting smashed by a huge one. if devs came out and said hey we hear you, our thinking caps are on . Then id say ok cool But seeing how long the sh epidemic plagued ee it worries me that instead of 80% sh, rosters next season will be 80% hansel. It's just dumb and could be avoided .
Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 @ Spil Dude you assume too much. and maybe thats why you come off arrogant, in my first post I asked a few questions and got met with a snooty reply. (your violin reference) I argued against stacked SH rosters, won't bore you with the details as that was seasons of back and forth with the devs. I also agree and brought the PS issue to the devs back when STR (can't remember the full clan name) was using this tactic, remember the 2-5 top 50 lb rest full blown PS's. clan...? And I'm with you, I hate the feeling of knowing I have lost the war at matchup because of who I was matched up with or rather what I was matched up with. I've had more of those then i could care to reminisce on. I commend you on trying to bring this issue to light, just your way of responding to what you feel is clueless players lacks tact, and of course the assumption you make about players not having EE knowledge. I wanted to explore what bank to 0 can mean in game, not just EE. imagine in osw your opponent goes ps to avoid cf. They steal bank to zero and sleep. No damage can be done to them. in that same sense ps EE clans, steal bank to 0 and repeat. I asked questions to get a better understanding, that was all. This post has gotten to long, i'll leave it at that. Good luck to you in EE and finding a solution to your issue.
Re: Add ability to bank gold to 0 when below lowest pot price (1 I apologize for coming across snooty but some of the responses in this thread are just completely insane lol So may have caught me at the wrong time That being said this ability would only work when your gold is less than the lowest pot price. And only in ee wars. It does not give us the ability to bank a tril with one button tap. All it does is give a build an actual chance to make plunder and deny the other side from immediately recouping it