Hansels were always an exploit build. The devs are just too scared to deal with the backlash if they ever change it.
I have this build n a PS1 n Hybrid of significant size for a variety of choice n needs. This build is most suitable for IWar only mostly. I use my PS1/PS for Primal n IWar being in higher demand for Primal over this Tank. The Hybrid is still building sufficient towers but close. That all said not everyone has these options. Going on SPILs point the opportunity for attack builds in Primal is lessening n the reason is as he stated. Therefore clan wars r in need of adjustments to offset stacking but not intended to lessen or remove PS1 ability to war. So be it some clans r well organized n smart at rostering nothing wrong with that n kudos to those well run war clans. Me being an advocate that clan wars r more important to the warring community changes r needed so all good war builds r viable. IWar is what it is. War hansels not needing ADT n ADP is an advantage when all other builds do not have it to use n doubles up for more eb plunder n savings in pots. So why not address the discrepancy by narrowing the gap n adjust plunder in EE?
They're not stacking the likes of you They're stacking hfbc hansels 15/16/17 mil spy attack Comprende?
Full Support. Having warred with Spil and matching all hansels it's an absolute joke of a war. Something needs to be done.
I've no problem with the stacking of hansels if it works copy it then. All war roster styles should be allowed to enter. But still there is an advantage there that can be reviewed. Other option is kill n replace Round War with a Clan War system where Attack builds have the upperhand to offset Primal stacking. Call it Siege Wars