I think all they need to do is take 4 zeros of all the kaw prices and such, 4 less digits per hit, for upgrades, allies and everything, i hate looking at these ridiculous numbers daily.
Look at potential building stats for L5 LL before suggesting they r viable. What stats would they be? I say LL r fine as is. I like the 2nd HL or HF idea best. Idk about both released in 1 calendar year being a good idea. New pots needed to keep pace if any new levels or lands r opened.
Maybe we should get a heavier banking tool. Such as a more expensive bb. Has been presented before as in silver bar, gold bar, etc.
There are I would guess around 3000 HFBC accounts out there if I would have to take an educated guess. But many are now not upgrading and focusing on purely allies for to the cost to benefit ratio so I don't think DEVS should get in any hurry on adding buildings or lands where so few are done as is.
Definitely too much gold in the system. I was saving during an event to buy a friend (800bil) and then we got to tokens so i spending all to use token on maxed upgrade for free 300 bil upgrade and I save again after the PvP promo and he is 1 trill There's my example. I think the promos are coming too often as well. What is it promo-2 week break-promo-repeat I can't get 1 trill in 2 weeks
If there were new lands to come out, i hope its on par with HLs not HF or stronger. Should be small to medium size CS buildings. But id prefer lvl 5 HL before any of that. And yes those war pots they came out with for a few days are near im sure to make all our towers nearly worthless again
How about the fact that there is 14 statless noobs in the top 200 of Most Valuable, and 2 are 2nd and 3rd
not for spy buildings. hl lvl4 at 158bill earned 40200 + stats. hf lvl2 at 150bill earned 40880 + stats. lvl4 hl for spy buildings is probably the worst upgrade there is for a spy.
Just saying if the devs wanted to curb the gold in the game, while at the same time revitalizing the ally market (and probably pissing some people off). Do an automatic 50-75% reduction in all ally prices. If you were 1T before you are now 500b. If you had 50T in allies you now have 25. This will remove much of the "banked" gold in allies, making the ally market once again "free" and literally remove 50-75% of the gold in kaw. Then when new lands are released players can't just sell/drop a few allies and BC within a day or two. The benefit to a static % as well is it will remove more from the higher priced allies. This would be a MAJOR disruption, tears and who knows what might happen. But rest easy all Ye who have massive ally banks. This will never come to pass. Like many of the ideas on the forums I tried to think of the most absurd option.
I went from about 1.6t to my current price during and right after the pvp event, at least with this influx of gold and the ability to keep crux chests if they release something new there's a real opportunity to catch up unlike with hf where it took the majority forever to even lc let alone hfbc.
I dont think that reducing all ally prices by an arbitrary percentage is the answer. Just as governments control the money supply through monetary policy, so too has KAW increased their money supply with the release of premium EBs that pay significantly more. This has created an artificially high demand which has lead to inflation. Reducing the price of all allies will do nothing to change the demand for allies and they will return to their natural equilibrium price. Only by increasing the supply of goods (new allies, lands, buildings) can the inflation of kaw currency stabilize. I think devs should consider clan upgrades that require very large amounts of gold saved by its members to upgrade clan abilities (member limits, attack/spy bonuses, new chat abilities).
You won't ever reduce the demand. If the most expensive ally becomes 500b for instance there will be a grab for good allies and people will volley them back up. Some will get rich others will gain allies and others will get screwed. At the end of the day it is a massive gold sink that will remove trillions from the market without adding any new lands or providing any real benefits to the players (well it will benefit those who have trillions sitting out right now as liquid gold who would be able to purchase tons of allies) Again it isn't a good idea just one way for ATA to remove massive amounts of gold from the market. If you remove the hte/chests you hurt everyone's ability to earn and HFBC. The issue with "new" lands or buildings isn't the buildings/lands themselves but the increasing gap between old and new players. The larger builds can easily farm smaller while those small builds have a hard time fighting back. No I don't see the apes doing anything to curb the gold in the game because it will deter people from buying seals/items etc. why spends cash to get gold that will be devalued when allies lose their price.
So instead you wanna take away gold players earned? It's not the players fault there's so much gold with nothing else to do with, cutting all ally hire costs would only hurt a small minority that actually have a decent amount of bfa, while not even effecting the majority in anyway. It's a terrible idea that would never be considered.
The purchase of xtals n seals are dropping already the # of HTE's being ran show it along with time taken to complete them ATA's statement of no new lands has slowed the sale of xtals especially in BC players.The handing out of building tokens as one of the best rewards in the last promo with the no land statement also hurt. The delay of their main KAW's Server maintenance,with all the game glitches,war enrollment dropping,lack of new players,alts excluded,a messed up ally market the no new land announcement is troubling for the future of KAW sales will continue to drop if nothing changes.
im not trying argue your findings, im just curious to know what resources you used. does ata have any public information available?