Regarding War Abuse (Updated 8/1)

Discussion in 'Past Announcements' started by [ATA]Grant, Jul 25, 2014.

  1. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    If I'm dying from stab wounds I don't want my legacy to be a war ban.

    Or a perm silence.

    #UnPermSilenceTerra
     
  2. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    Thank you!!!!
     
  3. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    How about you give a definition of spam?

    That way there is no confusion and you just don't ban and silence us at will?
     
  4. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    Is the war tracker a spammer?
     
  5. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    I would say tracking is spamming.

    More than 3 similar messages per 5 minute time frame.
     
  6. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    Cases like that are quite rare, but in that situation you would be banned from war for 3 Days. This isn't permanent, and you're more than welcome to come back and war once the war ban is over.

    Spam here will be defined as something that disrupts the clans ability to participate in wars. Trackers are not spam, but someone posting a single letter over and over, or other nonsensical content is spam.
     
  7. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    I'll make sure to report all trackers
     
  8. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    And I can't call ups because I'm a great sweeper?
     
  9. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    Support 
     
  10. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    @kaw_community what about my suggestion it will work better than your current system
     
  11. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    oh no now im screwed dang it
     
  12. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    @Community

    Would you somehow be able to protect against multiple accounts that are well built up but are from different devices so it looks legit?
     
  13. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    **** you and your ******* rules. It's a tactic to spam dumbass
     
  14. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    Well now it's a war bannable tactic
     
  15. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    Thank you, could you have a limit for how big a player can join the ee, maybe at least 12 lowland or castle lvl 2 or something, let's face it, a player with 300/150 300/150 will not make ee better.
     
  16. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    Super, that is a good idea.
     
  17. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    So, in order not to get ban. The player only need to have 1 action. Very doable for ppl who still able the screw the war and not getting ban. I hope there are better idea catch those who try to screw the war.
     
  18. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    Support :-D
     
  19. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    Finally doing something about war inactives.

    To the guy calling it a tactic, if it's such a good tatic why was there so many complaints about it? Kinda like the old WM names that were so long they were too hard to track due to the name running off the edge of the screen, that became an anti war name and started costing those players their EE and mith
     
  20. Re: Regarding War Abuse

    People complain about sh too, but that's not bannable.