New Lands, Potential War Balance, and New Epic Battles[IDEA]

Discussion in 'Ideas + Feature Requests' started by Seth, Jul 4, 2014.

  1. "Do not go where the path may lead, go instead where there is no path and leave a trail." - Ralph Waldo Emerson

    New Lands

    Hello fellow KaW people of the KaW realm of KaW. I'm a noob! And I'm not even HLBC... But! I know many people are HFBC with lvl3 T6 builds.

    Once you get to this point in the game, I can only assume the limitation of what you can do except completely tearing down your build and starting from scratch.

    I believe that even though the Hoarfrost was recently released, it is time for new lands!

    [​IMG]

    There you see a currently not used corner of the iOS version of your lowlands kingdom.

    (For you noobs, the lowlands in the central of your kingdom, where your castle is located.)

    I think this corner should be the location for the T7 buildings!

    Some names I have thought of:

    Floating Islands
    Glacial Mountains
    Snow Caps

    However we already have a cold snow themed area of land, mountains are pretty icy too!

    ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

    [​IMG]

    There you see another unused corner of the central part of your kingdom.

    This part of the kingdom looks to be a sort of hellish location, so generally, the potential T8 buildings would follow that style.

    Again, here are some concept names:

    Nether Plots
    Fields of the Damned
    Depths of the Damned

    ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––

    However these names are kind of cheesy, the new lands would add an objective for LB players, and it would add more variety in to build style.

    This could also help with war and PvP with things like EE and indi wars. It would make more diverse groups.

    This could also eliminate need for hunts and promos, because people have something to do, and not button mash 24/7.

    These new lands could also be added in with new sets of Epic Battles! New, higher and harder to hit ebs, with new styles of attack.

    I think not only lands, but War and Epic Battles would potentially benefit from this.

    If you have read this far, thanks! Support? If so, why? If not, why not? Any other thoughts? Reply. I enjoy reading as much as you enjoy responding.
     
  2. Re: New Lands, Potential War Balance, and New Epic Battles

    Really?
     
  3. Re: New Lands, Potential War Balance, and New Epic Battles

    Um NO SUPPORT....WHEN you HFBC ...u can offer IDEAS like this...n maybe you get A SpEck of CONSIDERATION...NOT!
     
  4. I think all the people who are hfbc with t6 lv3 should go hfbc with t6 lv5 before they start getting bored and worrying about what's next
     
  5. It takes a long time to completely max so this would be good in the long run
     
  6. No support. We have enough lands as it is.
     
  7. No support, if bored at hfbc just start building bfa and then get it stripped it the next osw

    New lands would just get too many people to leave, it makes Build Complete even more impossible then already, HFBC at the moment is 33t on average- already a risiculous amout.
     
  8. No support! You can work on your bfa once HFBC. No more lands!!!!
     
  9. Support I like it
     
  10. No. You dont know true grinding to get hfbc. My accnts run almost b2b hte and my farthest is only LC :lol: still a **** ton to do. No need for lb to get any bigger right now
     
  11. No support!
     
  12. Now u kno those are future lands?!! Congrats noob
     
  13. I think that devs know what the next lands will be.. its obvious that the other corners will be used.
     
  14. If you look in the quests, it tells the roadmap a for lands  some are just mixed up. And he next lands have already been talked about by the devs, they said the next lands will be harder than anything we have now. I'm guessing hat means harder to HFBC players.  I think this is gonna be their attempt at closing the gap :lol:
     
  15. No. Most people are still over a year away from being build complete. Leave it to the devs.
     
  16. Wait a year. Then consider it again