I like a negative spell like ESTOC edge in reverse - in other words, it reduces your plunder by 35% for 2 weeks for those that ACTIVATE in a war and DONT have any successful outgoing actions. If you have Estoc edge already, it still casts the spell as a "mark" on you for 2 weeks but drops your Estoc edge down by one. While it's perfectly understandable to sign up on a roster for a war-- days in advance and the have something unexpected happen in RL, BUT that scenario is not normally the case if you "cast for war" and the just don't show up. It's better to have no war then war with 2-3 inactives. A counter to this and frankly something we should also have is a spell to UN-activate for war at any point prior to match-up phase starting, that way if you cast many hours before, you can "uncast" and everyone in the clan is notified in CC and with a message - the same as when you cast. This would also be useful when someone mistakenly hits the CaST button when they meant to hit something else.
My only issue with this as a weak stat'd player, is I have done 3 ee's. 2/3 I've gotten no wins and was vastly outmatched
You make no sense. If you buy tickets to a nfl game you make it I'm sure. People invest time and money into EE war so there should be a negative affect against them for being inactive if it's a fair match.
Well for some un-seasoned players it is because they don't understand the system or follow wc. Inexperience plays into 0 actions a swell.
The so called "inactive=farm" is more than enough. Also, add up the shame (if the person has any self respect).
Support uncast. I think stated should show attempts plus successful actions then I support negative ee edge