I think some took my earlier post wrong. I am all in favor of "opt-in". In fact I am one who expressed support for it. I was just trying to advocate a better signed up system than the one in place. It would be nice to reduce the burden. opt-in is a nice step forward towards that goal. A minor tweak to the current system would be to auto-lock or auto-cap the war roster at the max for that war. So if roster is at max for war no one can cast the opt-in spell thus automatically preventing being over for war. Also adders to my earlier suggestion. Again just trying to make it easier to for all to war. 1) On players signup tab - you could have war times for their time zone to help them with all the time conversions. - Show Approved status ... which means clan selected them for war. 2) On Clan War Tab - add a roster lock button like for joining clan. This will allow clans to prevent going over the roster maximums for a given war. Assuming you don't "auto lock" of course. - Have "approve/disapprove" button to manage war roster should too many select "yes" for war. This would eliminate the need for kicking and the players loosing EE. Again just trying to make it easier to for all to war.
I support the nominated clans idea rather than the opt in or out spell. Most clans have sub clans or plan to build one at some stage. Nominated clans promotes clan loyalty and greater potential for growth of a clan and the game overall. Easier for clans and Devs to manage EE wars. It would also be harder to stack a clan to exploit a mismatch and remain loyal to your home clan using only registered/ nominated clans. If a big clan misses out on a war due to a mismatch then they should not be penalised for growing a strong and loyal clan. The opt in spell (or a button) could then be used to signal to clan admins which players are available for war ? days up to a week in advance. Those players would then move to their nominated war clan with rosters locked as they do now. This could work in 2 ways: 1. The clan nominates/ registers it's home clan, war clan and sub clan in which there would be no loss of EE bonus for movement between them. The nomination/ registration is then locked for the current EE season. 2. A player would nominate the above instead of a clan. This would cater for small/ new clans that are still growing and enabling it's members to join other clans for EE war. Players would not lose EE bonus when returning to their home clan. Once their home clan nominates/ registers a war clan then a player would again nominate their home clan. Sorry for the long post and any repeating of prior posts just trying to help the discussion.
Toa, so... Are you saying that clan a and b r affiliated. Clan a does tier 5and above ebs but clan b does...tfo n war? It's a bit weird that u can just change clan within family because a clan should probably grow to a good size before doing war or harder ebs.
They should update the quests so you can assassinate spy and steel so you can get more gold and crystals and other things
Hey kaw, u gonna change the "loss of ee level when u leave clan" rule? Ee level is suppose to promote clan loyalty but lots of clans are just inviting peeps to war and many leave to return to home clan after the war. Why don't u use ee to reward peeps that are willing to war instead of using it to build clan loyalty. Stop making us lose ee level when we leave clan.
This new update stopping the big difference in numbers does not work. Unbeknown clan keep getting 15 more members than any other clans they go up against. This is not a fair war, this is not a war this is not fun at all
Can I just say that I personally would like to see the matchups. What I mean is after matchup the devs should post the clan rankings, strength and participants. Show some transparency in the matchup system so we can all see how much effort you are actually putting in to make sure matchups are a fair balanced fight. All I see is clan ranked 1 vs clan ranked 2 or 12vs13. Maybe if you looked harder at the matchups then as an example clan 1 might get a better fight against clan 3 who might have more participants but slightly weaker than clan 2. Just my thoughts but I would very much like to see the algorithm posted showing the aforementioned data. Shouldn't be difficult to post this info as you should already have it to hand. Clan rank---Strength---number of participants Let us, the important ones in this game, decide if it has been done to the best of your ability. That way all this talk about unfair matchups might go away.
KAW crash 5 mins in2 War n continue crash until the end of war totals over 10x LAGS is the killer in the game. War5
@blahlala Look at pages 14-15 and link to see the idea toa is adding too. I'd keep it a bit simpler but that's open to all views and discussion. As for subs and being affiliated linked. Yes of course. We are already linked to our alliances and sub clans and war with each other. Why should some lose their rewards as they return back to their normal clans. It's exactly because of tiered ebs that some return home. As for stacked clans essentially you'd have more large clans warring and not so many small wars potentially. But the main goal is twofold. Rewards loyalty to all winners involved in wars not just some. And more importantly by allowing clans to resource combatants from a larger roster it enables us to fill war clans and subsequently potentially end or reduce mismatches by large numbers of players. If we have the ability to run every war clan with a maximum limit with no members ruled out due to lock down by ee limit then we can all choose to war in large full clans where we cannot be outnumbered. Just a thought.
@ MURYUMDER - What we do at UnBeKnown is being organized. We work hard to war at the top limit of participants. Why would it be unfair? These are the rules of the game. Try to organize you're clan, bro!
True neo, and we also try to get exactly 60 members per war so deal with it, today for example, we were matched against Playmate Dolls and our strength was 9/60 and they were 10/60. They had 60 members and we had 58, we still won 175-120. It's about the clan as a whole, not the individuals in a clan, that determines the strength of the clan during war.
It all about tactics and team work UBK just work hard and get full members we don't tell you to get less members And KAW my KAW app went off in war 5 4 times and got Ko PLZ fix it thanks don't care about KO just want it to fix