To the message above the one I posted earlier NEXT WEEKS TOPIC KILL THE IDIOT WHO SAID FOR OT TP BE ***WAR SYSTEMS I STILL VOTE YES BECAUSE WE ARE VOTING ON MORE THEN JUST FREAKING MITH AND JUST HEALTH CRYSTALS WE ARE VOTING ON BOTH....
What if instead of having it based off numbers just say every clan can use x amount of xtals. They can split the use however they like. One person could even use all of them if they wanted. But that would create an even greater need for teamwork and either clan can have their bigger builds use the xtals. Just a thought.
This is just a ploy to generate $ for the devs! It becomes a pay to play for smaller clans! Greedy!!!!!!!!
Vote no. This is badly thought out. Wars are already pay to play with xtals determining many wars. Now you want smaller clans to pay more money to war to solve an issue that clans can solve by filling their rosters. This is purely going to hurt people's ability to participate as clans will only accept those willing to buy and use xtals. The midfield are already meat shields in wars and forced to pay to play to get out of pin. Then their is the issue of who would get to use the xtals. Obviously if its first come first served then some people would just offload 6 xtals to try and hoard the mith payout. Various options but none ideal. Would you even compensate the smaller clans with the return of the extra xtals they are forced to use? Mith payout for wars is still pathetically low and little incentive to war. Also no allowance still for mith lost when clans ff. the numbers are for clans to deal with. The lag rewards and incentive to war are the devs problems to solve. Not much point warring for hour after hour losing family time for the equivalent of 1 enchants worth of mith some getting far less. Make it worth our time and stop with knee jerk reactions that force people to pay for things that can't be fixed. Ee is also a pain in the **** it forced clans to pick and choose people have to give it up to make space with the new clan number limits veiled members take valuable space meaning some clans cannot war at max numbers. That hurts far more than the numbers. ⛔ You force clans to kick members to meet the 45 or 60 limits active warring. Your reward system for loyalty is failing and hurting clans. Either let us use war clans nominated or just let people keep the Edge wherever they go. We are all loyal to clans for friends not a silly gold spell. It does nothing but take rewards away from those forced to move clans to war out of main or alliance clans or those kicked to make space to fill the actives. War at 30 and your definitely outnumbered. Solve those issues first. And clans can solve the numbers signing up.
While I personally like the idea as a temporary fix, my vote is No because I'm voting in the interest of the community at large. Not every pre-teen playing this game is able to afford more crystals. My Suggestion: instead of increasing xstal on weak side, DECREASE xstals on large side. We all are aware going in of the 2 xstal limit. Again that would be just another temporary fix until a more permanent solution is discovered. I personally feel matchups are fine as is and the odd mismatch is the nature of the beast.
I disagree with the xtal point. It doesn't really help to even matchup since more xtal means more cash to loose from a ko even though it gives more strategical options for the 4xtal team. I think it best to do ur possible to get even roosters. If not possible then additional xtal may help yes. Opponent must be informed at matchup as well. The rest I agree.
NO NO NO to more xtals !!! Allowing people to use more xtals to compensate for an unequal matchup forces people to invest more money to be able to win a war, and is a kinda easy way out not trying to solve the real problem. Many people already do not even have the money to war frequently using only 2 xtals per war. Second, the art of timekeeping is already hard enough with everybody using 2 xtals. Simply matching up within a 10% or 15% margin of combined stats and bfa and a same margin in numbers of peeps on the warroster should do, if not possible, then do not matchup. Rather a message a matchup was not possible than an unequal matchup forcing the underlying party to use more xtals to have a fair chance of winning.