Attack builds are dead

Share your game strategies.

Moderator: Kingdoms at War

Re: Attack builds are dead

Postby Boba-Fett on Sep 29 2017, 9:23pm

Is that the only rebuttal you can come up with Sully when people disagree with you? "U not smert lurn 2 red" cause that's pretty weak, I read the OP it consisted of you complaining about a plunder gap that has always existed cause you don't make enough per EB,how it's difficult for your build type to find EE cause no one wants that build on their roster (because another build as we already established makes more, more plunder wins the wars) crying how you gotta pick between EB or osw targets (btw real osw isn't about staying ahead in plunder or equipment, it is about clans taking what resources they have at that moment, going toe to toe and seeing who comes out on top) as if that were some real question or concern.
Boba-Fett
 
Posts: 3167
Joined: Aug 23 2010, 9:35pm

Re: Attack builds are dead

Postby JackJohnny on Sep 30 2017, 3:17am

I too do not get the EE portion of the post.

The plunder differential has been there for ages. Countless have alrd complained about it. It's not any "new development" per se.
JackJohnny
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Oct 21 2011, 7:34am

Re: Attack builds are dead

Postby Sully on Sep 30 2017, 5:02am

Boba-Fett wrote:Is that the only rebuttal you can come up with Sully when people disagree with you? "U not smert lurn 2 red" cause that's pretty weak, I read the OP it consisted of you complaining about a plunder gap that has always existed cause you don't make enough per EB,how it's difficult for your build type to find EE cause no one wants that build on their roster (because another build as we already established makes more, more plunder wins the wars) crying how you gotta pick between EB or osw targets (btw real osw isn't about staying ahead in plunder or equipment, it is about clans taking what resources they have at that moment, going toe to toe and seeing who comes out on top) as if that were some real question or concern.


It's the only rebuttal I need when you are not actually replying to the points that are made in the original post.

You read wrong again. This is about recent developments. There has always been a minimal plunder difference. It has grown exponentially with the new lands and buildings.

You missed the boat on EE as well. No one wants my build in their season wars? In indi? In LL wars? One doesn't exist, one they don't have a choice as anyone can war and one is just your lowlands. Think it through smart guy. Weird how so many others on the thread understood yet you didn't.

I really don't have to emphasize how you missed the point on the osw part of it because your size makes that abundantly clear. Since you haven't figured it out yourself, even with your build, have fun being an "osw threat" to anyone that's only played for a couple months. Because after that, just like 99% of kaw, they will be bigger than you with better equipment and you'll be even more useless. It's cute really, what you think osw is hasn't been that since around 2012.
Sully
 
Posts: 1511
Joined: Dec 13 2012, 7:56am

Re: Attack builds are dead

Postby Sushi on Sep 30 2017, 10:40am

Sully wrote:
Boba-Fett wrote:Is that the only rebuttal you can come up with Sully when people disagree with you? "U not smert lurn 2 red" cause that's pretty weak, I read the OP it consisted of you complaining about a plunder gap that has always existed cause you don't make enough per EB,how it's difficult for your build type to find EE cause no one wants that build on their roster (because another build as we already established makes more, more plunder wins the wars) crying how you gotta pick between EB or osw targets (btw real osw isn't about staying ahead in plunder or equipment, it is about clans taking what resources they have at that moment, going toe to toe and seeing who comes out on top) as if that were some real question or concern.


It's the only rebuttal I need when you are not actually replying to the points that are made in the original post.

You read wrong again. This is about recent developments. There has always been a minimal plunder difference. It has grown exponentially with the new lands and buildings.

You missed the boat on EE as well. No one wants my build in their season wars? In indi? In LL wars? One doesn't exist, one they don't have a choice as anyone can war and one is just your lowlands. Think it through smart guy. Weird how so many others on the thread understood yet you didn't.

I really don't have to emphasize how you missed the point on the osw part of it because your size makes that abundantly clear. Since you haven't figured it out yourself, even with your build, have fun being an "osw threat" to anyone that's only played for a couple months. Because after that, just like 99% of kaw, they will be bigger than you with better equipment and you'll be even more useless. It's cute really, what you think osw is hasn't been that since around 2012.

Lmfao literally rekt
Sushi
 
Posts: 496
Joined: Jun 24 2011, 5:14pm

Re: Attack builds are dead

Postby gingerboss on Sep 30 2017, 9:54pm

Well they do
gingerboss
 
Posts: 6
Joined: May 15 2017, 11:35pm

Re: Attack builds are dead

Postby SKILGANNON_THE_DAMNED on Oct 1 2017, 12:54am

I agree that something needs to be done , I actually lose plunder if i hit ebs with spys , where as other builds fill their boots , you only have to look at accounts in LB in events , enough said , Everything is supposed to be equal,but im not dead either lmao
SKILGANNON_THE_DAMNED
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Jan 23 2015, 2:53pm

Re: Attack builds are dead

Postby TPP-Relic-TPP on Oct 4 2017, 9:53am

Erm, I am lvl 5 EE and all I war in indi wars! I’m a towerless tank in attack at least. I plunder 6/7 bil from start only due to the heavy incoming I get but when I xtal I make between 16/18 bil. I keep spy towers high with a decent bfa leaning that way and I seem to come out ok in wars.
TPP-Relic-TPP
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Jul 20 2016, 3:39pm

Previous

Return to Strategy

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 5seth, dShadow and 0 guests