#NetNeutrality

Talk about anything not directly related to the game.

Moderator: Kingdoms at War

Re: #NetNeutrality

Postby Yogurt on Dec 14 2017, 8:29pm

Thats a good point. Thankfully historically the only force strong enough to censor anything on the internet is the individuals own ignorance. You can find information on any subject if you actually go look for it. The problem is complacency. People expect that information to be found and processed for them, chewed up and fed to them by biased media.

But heres the real, technical argument. Isps can automatically block certain keyword combinations, ip addresses and even groups of people on generated watchlists from accessing the internet. Thankfully, isps can only block information that they can actually read. Nowadays encryption is so strong that its a waste of time for the NSA to try to decrypt one of your emails. It would take days with the current technology. Quantum computing can help, but then we'll just have better and better encryption as that technology gets better and better. The NSA just asks gmail to open your emails for them anyway. As long as your information is encrypted, they will not be able to tell tell exactly what you are doing. Sure, they could block your ip, but I think that's an issue that far exceeds net neutrality and should have no basis in this current discussion.


Like I said before, Twitter dumps its profits into RnD then keeps that money so they dont have to be taxed for that would be profit.

The following refers to Twitter's Form 10-K for 2015. Part 2 item 8 states their total accumulated deficit to be 2,093,477,000. Their total cost of operation for 2015 is 2,668,068,000 with a good 806,648,000 stowed away in research and development and 871,491,000 in sales and marketing.
Ask yourself this: why does a social media platform need about 1.5 billion dollars in RnD and sales? All that money invested and you'd think a corporation as big as Twitter would be able to budget properly and save its shares from plummeting from 70 to about 28 (last I recall) dollars a share. Here's a hint: twitter chairman jack Dorsey owns less than 5% of Twitter shares. Biz stone, Evan Williams, and the other founder (Noah?) Own less than that. They dont care about shares.

I could go on but I don't want to do your research for you. Look up their annual fiscal statements and see for yourself.
Yogurt
 
Posts: 798
Joined: Oct 26 2013, 9:42pm

Re: #NetNeutrality

Postby Ecstasy on Dec 14 2017, 11:29pm

[This comment has been removed by your internet provider.]

[To see full comments please subscribe to our "Forum Media internet package", for an additional $12.95/mo.]
Ecstasy
 
Posts: 271
Joined: Dec 28 2010, 4:02am

Re: #NetNeutrality

Postby TheRealDMC-Echo2Charlie on Dec 15 2017, 6:11am

NotEcstasy wrote:[This comment has been removed by your internet provider.]

[To see full comments please subscribe to our "Forum Media internet package", for an additional $12.95/mo.]


:lol:
TheRealDMC-Echo2Charlie
 
Posts: 1158
Joined: Dec 9 2012, 9:57am

Re: #NetNeutrality

Postby U_BEEN_HUGGED on Dec 15 2017, 6:40am

Yogurt wrote:Thats untrue cherry. Thats the kind of myth people come up with when they get all their information secondhand via memes and sensationalist far-left news article titles.


It’s half true, they claim their intent isn’t to set up platforms like that just to milk consumers for more money. I think we all know these companies are incredible greedy and as soon as they feel they can get away with doing something this for money they will.

Any system where doing something like is even remotely possible is infinitely worse than the open internet we have now.
U_BEEN_HUGGED
 
Posts: 165
Joined: Dec 8 2010, 3:58pm

Re: #NetNeutrality

Postby TakuniTheCat on Dec 15 2017, 6:54am

NetNeutraliy was passed in 2015 and in place for less than 2 years. I’m not overly worried about going back to the dark ages of 2 years ago. 99% of people don’t have a clue what there upset about.
TakuniTheCat
 
Posts: 57
Joined: May 11 2011, 1:01pm

Re: #NetNeutrality

Postby --CF_White__Wolf_CF-- on Dec 18 2017, 11:47am

So if your argument is

"Net neutrality has been passed before and there was no change"

Then,


Why was it gotten rid of in the first place and why does it need to go back?


Surely if there was no change at all between net neutrality and no net neutrality then you can just not bother getting rid of it and save all the time and effort
--CF_White__Wolf_CF--
 
Posts: 17
Joined: Jan 11 2017, 9:35am

Re: #NetNeutrality

Postby Yogurt on Dec 18 2017, 12:13pm

No, I dont think thats his argument at all.
Yogurt
 
Posts: 798
Joined: Oct 26 2013, 9:42pm

Re: #NetNeutrality

Postby AshtonRocks on Dec 20 2017, 9:28am

IlllIllIlI-PrObLeMaTiC-OwL wrote:As we all know it was a 3-2 split. The FCC has voted to repeal net neutrality. Although this has happened the fight is not over! This decision will be passed through congress and overturned. #FREEINTERNET


Good. Most people don't even realize that Title 2 does nothing to stop ISPs from "curating" the internet.

Anyone else here use T-mobile? Netflix is completely free and does NOT use up your data if you do use T-mobile. In turn T-mobile puts your normal video streaming on normal "lanes" and Netflix streams are prioritized. Guess what? No ones complaining. I don't even use Netflix and my Youtube 1080p streams are perfectly fine.

Either way NN only really affects normies. I hope it gets repealed. But if it doesn't get repealed it doesn't really bother me.
AshtonRocks
 
Posts: 742
Joined: Aug 19 2014, 9:15pm

Previous

Return to Off Topic

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests